切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华老年病研究电子杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (04) : 23 -26. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8757.2023.04.003

临床研究

胃镜下碎石器联合圈套器治疗老年人巨大胃石疗效分析
齐向娟1, 江勇1,()   
  1. 1. 300211 天津,天津医科大学第二医院消化内科
  • 收稿日期:2023-08-11 出版日期:2023-11-28
  • 通信作者: 江勇

Clinical observation on the therapeutic effect of gastroscopy combined with stone crushers and snares in the treatment of giant gastric stones in elderly patients

Xiangjuan Qi1, Yong Jiang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Gastroenterology, the Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300211, China
  • Received:2023-08-11 Published:2023-11-28
  • Corresponding author: Yong Jiang
引用本文:

齐向娟, 江勇. 胃镜下碎石器联合圈套器治疗老年人巨大胃石疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2023, 10(04): 23-26.

Xiangjuan Qi, Yong Jiang. Clinical observation on the therapeutic effect of gastroscopy combined with stone crushers and snares in the treatment of giant gastric stones in elderly patients[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Geriatrics Research(Electronic Edition), 2023, 10(04): 23-26.

目的

观察胃镜下碎石器联合圈套器治疗老年人巨大胃石的临床疗效。

方法

选择2020年2月至2023年5月天津医科大学第二医院收治的确诊为巨大胃石症的103例老年住院患者为研究对象。其中51例患者采用内镜下传统碎石器治疗(对照组),余52例患者采用内镜下碎石器联合圈套器治疗(观察组),两组患者碎石后均口服碳酸氢钠治疗。比较两组患者的治愈率、手术操作时间、患者舒适度、碎石后进餐时间、住院时间及住院费用。计量资料的比较采用t检验;计数资料的比较采用χ2检验。

结果

两组患者治疗总有效率的差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.020,P>0.05)。观察组手术操作时间明显短于对照组、数字视觉模拟评分明显低于对照组(t=3.751、9.578,P<0.01)。两组患者碎石后进餐时间的差异无统计学意义(t=0.923,P>0.05)。观察组患者碎石器使用数量和住院费用均明显少于对照组(t=4.057、2.911,P<0.01),但两组患者住院时间的差异无统计学意义(t=0.463,P>0.05)。

结论

胃镜下碎石器联合圈套器治疗老年人巨大胃石具有手术操作时间短、患者舒适度高、住院费用低等优点,值得临床推广。

Objective

To observe the therapeutic effect of gastroscopy combined with stone crushers and snares in the treatment of giant gastric stones in elderly patients.

Methods

A total of 103 elderly patients with giant gastric stones diagnosed under endoscopy hospitalized in the Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University from February 2020 to May 2023 were enrolled. All patients were randomly divided into the control group (51 cases) and the observation group (52 cases) according to a random number table. The control group was treated with traditional lithotripters under endoscopy, followed by oral sodium bicarbonate. The observation group was treated with lithotripters combined with snares, followed by oral sodium bicarbonate. The total effective rate, endoscopic operation time, patient comfort, first meal time, length of hospital stay and total hospitalization cost between two groups were compared using t test or χ2 test.

Results

There was no statistically significant difference in the total effective rate between the two groups (χ2=0.020, P > 0.05). The operation time of the observation group was significantly less than that of the control group (t=3.751, P < 0.01). The visual analogue scale score in observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (t=9.578, P < 0.01). The number of stone crushers used in the observation group was significantly less than that in the control group (t=4.057, P < 0.01). The hospitalization cost in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (t=2.911, P < 0.01). There was no statistically significant difference in average meal time and length of hospital stay between the two groups (t=0.923 and 0.463, P > 0.05).

Conclusion

The combination of gastroscopic lithotripsy and snare for the treatment of giant gastric stones in the elderly has the advantages of short surgical operation time, high patient comfort, and low hospitalization costs, which is worthy of clinical promotion.

表1 两组患者治疗结果的比较(例或±s
表2 两组患者耗材使用、住院时间及住院费用的比较(±s
[1]
于皆平,沈志祥,罗和生.实用消化病学[M].2版.北京:科学出版社,2007:402.
[2]
段军,宋文先,伍晓刚,等.胃镜破碎术联合碳酸饮料治疗胃柿石疗效观察[J].临床消化病杂志201525(2):108-109.
[3]
樊超强,张朋彬,于劲,等.口服5%碳酸氢钠溶液联合胃镜序贯治疗胃石症的疗效观察[J].中华消化内镜杂志201330(7):404-406.
[4]
Liu LN, Wang L, Jia SJ, et al. Clinical features, risk factors, and endoscopic treatment of bezoars: A retrospective analysis from a single center in Northern China[J/OL]. Med Sci Monit, 2020, 26:e926539.
[5]
郭世斌,仲小伟,冷晶.胃石的病因及内镜下治疗[J].中华消化内镜杂志200421(6):411-412.
[6]
Sugimoto S, Shimono T, Takeshita T, et al. Clinical and CT findings of small bowel obstruction caused by rice cakes in comparison with bezoars[J]. Jpn J Radiol, 2019, 37(4):301-307.
[7]
刘宝珍,薛春霞,马风博,等.老年人胃石症36例临床分析[J].中华老年医学杂志201131(8):692-693.
[8]
付大元.胃镜检查过程中对患者的舒适护理要点分析[J].中国卫生标准管理20189(1):147-148.
[9]
任素芳,张丽,褚敏,等.胃镜下应用碎石器联合圈套器治疗巨大胃石症疗效观察[J].中国药物与临床201919(21):3749-3750.
[10]
Zhang FH, Ding XP, Zhang JH, et al. Acute esophageal obstruction caused by reverse migration of gastric bezoars: A case report[J]. World J Clin Cases, 2020, 8(14):3130-3135.
[11]
Vorovskiy OO, Shushkovska YY, Afanasiuk OI. Stomachbezoaris, causes of development, diagnosis andmethods of treatment[J]. Wiad Lek, 2021, 74(1):128-131.
[12]
孟凡涛.钬激光碎石术与传统术式治疗胃结石的临床比较研究[J].中国中西医结合消化杂志201725(12):983-985.
[13]
姜飒,孟凡涛,杨爽.不同取石方法治疗植物性胃结石临床分析[J].中国医刊201954(2):215-218.
[14]
Tao Z, Pu W, Sun L, et al. Cap-assisted large cold snare removal of a giant phytobezoar[J/OL]. Endoscopy, 2022, 54(5):E222-E223.
[15]
Grande G, Manno M, Zulli C, et al. An alternative endoscopic treatment for massive gastric bezoars: Ho:YAG laser fragmentation[J/OL]. Endoscopy, 2016, 48 Suppl 1:E217.
[16]
Tao Z, Yu Y, Zhou X. New application of dual knife: Easier removal of a giant gastric bezoar[J/OL]. Dig Endosc, 2019, 31(3):e62-e63.
[17]
孙艳君,刘佰纯,从靓,等.61例植物性胃石药物与内镜的治疗分析[J].胃肠病学和肝病学杂志201827(1):59-61.
[18]
许亚男,吴龙奇,赵中松.76例胃结石患者内镜治疗与药物保守治疗效果的比较分析[J].临床内科杂志202037(1):61-62.
[19]
Iwamuro M, Yunoki N, Tomoda J, et al. Gastric bezoar treatment by endoscopic fragmentation in combination with Pepsi-Cola® administration[J]. Am J Case Rep, 2015, 16:445-448.
[20]
孙超,朱滢,陈功,等.内镜下机械碎石治疗植物性胃石症疗效[J/CD].中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版)20188(5):207-209.
[21]
张阳,吕宜光.胃石症的病因及诊治进展[J].现代医学202048(7):925-930.
[1] 王杰, 袁泉, 王玥琦, 乔佳君, 谭春丽, 夏仲元, 刘守尧. 溃疡油在糖尿病足溃疡治疗中的应用效果及安全性观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 480-484.
[2] 杨建波, 马欢, 黄小梅, 刘华柱. 结肠镜辅助下EMR、CSP和RFA术治疗直径<1cm结直肠息肉的疗效和安全性比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 76-79.
[3] 宋俊锋, 张珍珍. 单侧初发性腹股沟斜疝老年患者经腹腹膜前疝修补术中残余疝囊腹直肌下缘固定效果评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 670-674.
[4] 张晋伟, 董永红, 王家璇. 基于GBD2021 数据库对中国与全球老年人疝疾病负担和健康不平等的分析比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 708-716.
[5] 王浩, 艾克拜尔·艾力, 麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明, 李义亮, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 不同检查方法对巨大食管裂孔疝合并胃食管反流病的诊断价值及各检查指标间的相关性分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 494-500.
[6] 李义亮, 苏拉依曼·牙库甫, 麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 机器人与腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术联合Nissen 胃底折叠术短期疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 512-517.
[7] 周艳, 李盈, 周小兵, 程发辉, 何恒正. 不同类型补片联合Nissen 胃底折叠术修补食管裂孔疝的疗效及复发潜在危险因素[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 528-533.
[8] 王小琴, 汪丽, 崔建英. 无张力疝修补术治疗慢性肾功能衰竭合并腹股沟疝患者的疗效[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 538-542.
[9] 陈杰, 武明胜, 李一金, 李虎, 向源楚, 荣新奇, 彭健. 低位直肠癌冷冻治疗临床初步分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 494-498.
[10] 史彬, 司远. 益气和络方联合缬沙坦治疗气阴两虚兼血瘀证IgA 肾病的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 306-312.
[11] 王贝贝, 崔振义, 王静, 王晗妍, 吕红芝, 李秀婷. 老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者术后贫血预测模型的构建与验证[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 355-362.
[12] 韩俊岭, 王刚, 马厉英, 连颖, 徐慧. 维生素D 联合匹维溴铵治疗腹泻型肠易激综合征患者疗效及对肠道屏障功能指标的影响研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 560-564.
[13] 丁亚琴, 方旭, 戴彦成. 基于紧密型医联体的“一免三优先政策”在基层消化道肿瘤筛查中的应用探讨[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 481-484.
[14] 崔健, 夏青, 林云, 李光玲, 李心娜, 王位. 血小板与淋巴细胞比值、免疫球蛋白、心肌酶谱及心电图对中老年肝硬化患者病情及预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 400-406.
[15] 阳跃, 庹晓晔, 崔子豪, 欧阳四民, 林海阳, 胡景宇, 胡银, 李涛, 赵景峰, 郝岱峰, 冯光. 改良“阅读者”皮瓣修复骶尾部压疮的疗效[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 751-755.
阅读次数
全文


摘要