切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华老年病研究电子杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (02) : 35 -39. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8757.2022.02.008

老年消化疾病

地佐辛联合耳穴压豆对老年患者无痛胃镜下黏膜切除术后疼痛的缓解效果
陈礼鹏1, 程启闰1, 朱为民1, 季木西2, 郑培奋1,()   
  1. 1. 310013 杭州,浙江医院消化内科
    2. 310013 杭州,浙江医院内镜中心
  • 收稿日期:2021-12-02 出版日期:2022-05-28
  • 通信作者: 郑培奋
  • 基金资助:
    浙江省医药卫生科技项目(2020KY397)

Efficacy of dezocine combined with auricular point sticking to relieve the postoperation pain of painless gastric endoscopic mucosal resection in elderly patients

Lipeng Chen1, Qirun Cheng1, Weimin Zhu1, Muxi Ji2, Peifen Zheng1,()   

  1. 1. Digestive System Department, Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou 310013, China
    2. Endoscopy Center, Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou 310013, China
  • Received:2021-12-02 Published:2022-05-28
  • Corresponding author: Peifen Zheng
引用本文:

陈礼鹏, 程启闰, 朱为民, 季木西, 郑培奋. 地佐辛联合耳穴压豆对老年患者无痛胃镜下黏膜切除术后疼痛的缓解效果[J/OL]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2022, 09(02): 35-39.

Lipeng Chen, Qirun Cheng, Weimin Zhu, Muxi Ji, Peifen Zheng. Efficacy of dezocine combined with auricular point sticking to relieve the postoperation pain of painless gastric endoscopic mucosal resection in elderly patients[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Geriatrics Research(Electronic Edition), 2022, 09(02): 35-39.

目的

探讨术前静脉应用地佐辛联合术后给予耳穴压豆对老年患者无痛胃镜下黏膜切除术后疼痛的缓解效果。

方法

选取2020年1月至2021年2月在浙江医院接受无痛胃镜下黏膜切除术的老年患者300例并随机(抽签法)分组,其中100例术前应用地佐辛联合术后耳穴压豆(地佐辛+耳穴压豆组),100例仅术前应用地佐辛(地佐辛组),100例无上述干预措施(对照组)。排除胃镜检查时发现合并消化性溃疡、手术中发现新病灶及术后出现迟发性穿孔的30例患者,最终地佐辛+耳穴压豆组88例、地佐辛组93例、对照组89例。采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)对患者术后3、12、24、48 h的腹痛程度进行评分,统计术后不良反应等情况。计数资料的比较采用χ2检验,计量资料的比较采用方差分析,腹痛程度的比较采用混合效应模型。

结果

地佐辛+耳穴压豆组、地佐辛组术后腹痛发生率的差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.221,P>0.05),但均明显低于对照组(χ2=8.037、5.924,P<0.05或0.01)。3组患者腹痛程度的差异呈现出组别、时间差异(F=7.718、29.690,P<0.01);地佐辛+耳穴压豆组和地佐辛组的腹痛程度均较对照组轻(P<0.01),患者术后12、24 h腹痛程度均高于术后3、48 h(P<0.01)。3组患者术后不良反应发生率的差异无统计学意义(χ2=4.260,P>0.05)。

结论

地佐辛联合术后及时给予耳穴压豆对缓解老年患者胃镜下黏膜切除术后疼痛有较好的效果,无明显不良反应,值得临床推广。

Objective

To evaluate the effectiveness of dezocine combined with auricular point sticking to relieve the postoperation pain of painless gastric endoscopic mucosal resection in elderly patients.

Methods

A total of 300 elderly patients who underwent painless endoscopic mucosal resection in Zhejiang Hospital during January 2020 and February 2021 were randomly divided into three groups. Among them, 100 cases were treated with dizocine before operation combined with auricular point sticking after operation (dizocine + auricular point sticking group), 100 cases were treated with dizocine only (dizocine group), and 100 cases were not treated with the above intervention measures (control group). Excluding 30 cases with peptic ulcer found during gastroscopy, new focus found during operation and delayed perforation after operation, there were 88 cases in the dizocine + auricular point sticking group, 93 cases in the dizocine group and 89 cases in the control group. Visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to score the degree of abdominal pain at 3, 12, 24 and 48 hours after operation, and the postoperative adverse reactions were recorded. Chi-square test was used for comparison of counting data, analysis of variance was used for comparison of measurement data, and mixed effect model was used to compare the degree of abdominal pain.

Results

The incidence of postoperative abdominal pain in the dizocine + auricular point sticking group and dizocine group was significantly lower than that in the control group (χ2=8.037, 5.924, P < 0.05 or 0.01), but there was no significant difference between the two groups (χ2=0.221, P > 0.05). The degree of abdominal pain was differed among groups and among different time points (F=7.718, 29.690, P < 0.01), which was lighter in dizocine + auricular point sticking group and dizocine group compared with the control group (P < 0.01), and that at 12 and 24 hours after operation was higher than that at 3 and 48 hours after operation (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative adverse reactions among the three groups (χ2=4.260, P > 0.05) .

Conclusion

Dizocine combined with auricular point sticking has a good effect on relieving the pain of elderly patients after endoscopic mucosal resection without obvious adverse reactions, which is worthy of clinical application.

表2 3组患者术后3 h腹痛评分情况(例)
表3 3组患者术后12 h腹痛评分情况(例)
表4 3组患者术后24 h腹痛评分情况(例)
表5 3组患者术后48 h腹痛评分情况(例)
表6 3组患者术后不良反应的发生情况[例(%)]
[1]
曹毛毛,陈万青.中国恶性肿瘤流行情况及防控现状[J].中国肿瘤临床201946(3):145-149.
[2]
左婷婷,郑荣寿,曾红梅,等.中国胃癌流行病学现状[J].中国肿瘤临床201744(1):52-58.
[3]
赵晓晏.EMR/ESD治疗早期胃癌[J].现代医药卫生201733(7):985-987.
[4]
王翠萍.无痛胃镜与普通胃镜检查的比较[J].中外医学研究201715(23):53-54.
[5]
李保全.无痛内镜诊疗技术与常规方法检查消化内科疾病的对比研究[J].系统医学20194(18):50-52.
[6]
Kim JW, Jang JY, Park YM, et al. Clinicopathological characteristics of patients with pain after endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric epithelial neoplasm[J]. Surg Endosc, 2019, 33(3):794-801.
[7]
陈小慧,任晓强,马亚兵,等.术后疼痛引起老年患者术后认知功能障碍的相关机制研究进展[J].南方医科大学学报201939(9):1122-1126.
[8]
杨艳华.地佐辛注射液缓解术后疼痛的安全性与有效性临床分析[J].贵州医药201741(3):287-289.
[9]
张月鰆.耳穴压豆治疗术后疼痛的护理干预体会[J].健康前沿201726(6):88.
[10]
辛磊,李兆申.积极开展舒适化内镜筛查努力提高早期胃癌的诊断率[J].中华医学信息导报201631(17):15.
[11]
Bell A. The neurobiology of acute pain[J]. Vet J, 2018, 237:55-62.
[12]
张铁铮,李佳男.术后镇痛问题的思辨[J].医学与哲学201839(24):12-15.
[13]
郭云观,冯艺.亦敌亦友——术后阿片类药物镇痛研究进展[J].中国疼痛医学杂志201723(10):721-726.
[14]
曾彦茹,佘守章,黄宇光,等.阿片类药物地佐辛临床应用研究现状[J].广东医学201839(1):6-9.
[15]
肖湘,祝浩栋.地佐辛临床应用的研究进展[J].临床合理用药杂志201912(6):172-174.
[16]
An LJ, Zhang Y, Su Z, et al. A single dose dezocine suppresses emergence agitation in preschool children anesthetized with sevoflurane-remifentanil[J]. BMC Anesthesiol, 2017, 17(1):154.
[17]
Li XT, Ma CQ, Qi SH, et al. Combination of propofol and dezocine to improve safety and efficacy of anesthesia for gastroscopy and colonoscopy in adults: A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial[J]. World J Clin Cases, 2019, 7(20):3237-3246.
[18]
李竹梅.耳穴埋豆对腹部术后疼痛的护理观察[J].光明中医201631(12):1815-1817.
[19]
邓辉,杨敏,曾娟妮,等.耳穴压豆治疗慢性肛裂术后疼痛90例疗效观察[J].中国肛肠病杂志201939(3):62-63.
[20]
Kim SY, Jung SW, Choe JW, et al. Predictive factors for pain after endoscopic resection of gastric tumors[J]. Dig Dis Sci, 2016, 61(12):3560-3564.
[21]
孟曙龙.地佐辛注射液不良反应分析[J].临床合理用药杂志202013(2):14:.
[22]
贺晋豪,张晨宁,罗学虎,等. 29例地佐辛致不良反应文献分析[J].中国药物应用与监测202118(4):248-251.
[1] 陈晓玲, 钟永洌, 刘巧梨, 李娜, 张志奇, 廖威明, 黄桂武. 超高龄髋膝关节术后谵妄及心血管并发症风险预测[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 575-584.
[2] 陈翠萍, 李佩君, 杜景榕, 谢青梅, 许一宁, 卓姝妤, 李晓芳. 互联网联合上门护理在老年全髋关节置换术后的应用效果[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 676-681.
[3] 曾敬, 吴冬冬, 邵明, 范震波, 王治国, 刘培谊, 兰海峰. 高龄髋部骨折患者不同手术时机的围手术期疗效评估[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 445-449.
[4] 宋俊锋, 张珍珍. 单侧初发性腹股沟斜疝老年患者经腹腹膜前疝修补术中残余疝囊腹直肌下缘固定效果评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 670-674.
[5] 张晋伟, 董永红, 王家璇. 基于GBD2021 数据库对中国与全球老年人疝疾病负担和健康不平等的分析比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 708-716.
[6] 袁志静, 黄杰, 何国安, 方辉强. 罗哌卡因联合右美托咪定局部阻滞麻醉在老年腹腔镜下无张力疝修补术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 557-561.
[7] 许文娟, 伍翠云, 许燕, 倪超. 标准化人文关怀服务在腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 456-460.
[8] 邵世锋, 肖钦, 沈方龙, 张迅, 郝志鹏, 伍正彬, 谢晓娟, 王耀丽. 老年胸主动脉钝性伤的重症救治分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 762-767.
[9] 任甜甜, 张玉慧, 祁玲霞, 朱梅冬, 胡佳. 多学科疼痛管理对胸腔镜肺叶切除术后胸痛及应激反应的影响分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 630-633.
[10] 天津市天津医院, 中国医师协会骨科医师分会肩肘外科学组, 国际矫形与创伤外科学会(SICOT)中国部肩肘外科委员会, 中国医疗保健国际交流促进会骨科学分会肩肘外科学部. 老年肱骨近端骨折诊疗策略中国专家共识(2024年版)[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 193-204.
[11] 王贝贝, 崔振义, 王静, 王晗妍, 吕红芝, 李秀婷. 老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者术后贫血预测模型的构建与验证[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 355-362.
[12] 张骞, 唐伟, 刘丽丽. 右美托咪定复合羟考酮对老年经皮椎间孔镜腰椎间盘切除术患者术后认知功能、镇痛效果的影响[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 209-214.
[13] 鲁宁, 魏立友, 李亮, 张玉龙. 老年桡骨远端骨折小夹板治疗后早期腕关节功能恢复的相关因素分析[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 222-228.
[14] 崔健, 夏青, 林云, 李光玲, 李心娜, 王位. 血小板与淋巴细胞比值、免疫球蛋白、心肌酶谱及心电图对中老年肝硬化患者病情及预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 400-406.
[15] 赵倩, 刘文超, 李玺琳, 章邱东. 老年急性脑梗死诱发胃肠损伤的风险因素分析及模型构建[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(03): 213-217.
阅读次数
全文


摘要