切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华老年病研究电子杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (03) : 20 -24. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8757.2025.03.003

临床研究

老年糖尿病足患者截肢时机选择对预后的影响
刁秀杰()   
  1. 300211 天津医科大学第二医院手足与显微重建外科
  • 收稿日期:2025-05-02 出版日期:2025-08-28
  • 通信作者: 刁秀杰

Study on the impact of amputation timing selection on prognosis in elderly patients with diabetic foot

Xiujie Diao()   

  1. Hand and Microsurgical Reconstruction Surgery, the Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300211, China
  • Received:2025-05-02 Published:2025-08-28
  • Corresponding author: Xiujie Diao
引用本文:

刁秀杰. 老年糖尿病足患者截肢时机选择对预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2025, 12(03): 20-24.

Xiujie Diao. Study on the impact of amputation timing selection on prognosis in elderly patients with diabetic foot[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Geriatrics Research(Electronic Edition), 2025, 12(03): 20-24.

目的

探讨老年糖尿病足患者保肢治疗失败后不同截肢时机选择对预后的影响。

方法

回顾性分析2022年1月至2024年12月在天津医科大学第二医院接受保肢治疗失败后行截肢手术的37例老年糖尿病足患者的临床资料,根据截肢时机分为早期截肢组(保肢失败后≤72 h手术)16例和延迟截肢组(保肢失败后>72 h手术)21例。采用t检验或χ2检验比较两组患者术后并发症发生率、伤口愈合时间、住院时间、术后6个月生存率及生活质量评分。采用多因素Logistic回归分析影响预后的危险因素。

结果

早期截肢组和延迟截肢组术后总并发症发生率分别为31.25%和66.67%,差异有统计学意义(χ2=5.231,P<0.05);早期截肢组伤口愈合时间和住院时间分别为(28.6±5.2)d和(35.2±8.7)d,延迟截肢组分别为(42.5±7.8)d和(52.6±10.3)d,差异均有统计学意义(t=6.325、5.871,P<0.01)。术后6个月,早期截肢组生存率和生活质量评分分别为93.75%和(68.5±10.2)分,延迟截肢组分别为71.43%和(52.3±8.6)分,差异均有统计学意义(χ2=3.968,t=5.124;P<0.05或0.01)。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,截肢时机延迟、术前合并严重感染及营养状况差是影响预后的危险因素(OR=3.852、4.218、3.526,95%CI:1.215~12.163、1.356~13.132、1.087~11.445,P<0.05)。

结论

老年糖尿病足患者在保肢治疗失败后,应在病情相对稳定的前提下尽早实施截肢手术,可降低术后并发症发生率,缩短愈合及住院时间,提高生存率和生活质量。

Objective

To investigate the impact of different amputation timings on the prognosis of elderly patients with diabetic foot after failed limb salvage therapy, and to provide evidence for optimizing clinical decision-making regarding amputation.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 37 elderly patients with diabetic foot who underwent amputation after failed limb salvage therapy in the Department of Hand and Foot Surgery of our hospital from January 2022 to December 2024. According to the timing of amputation, patients were divided into an early amputation group (surgery within 72 hours after failed limb salvage, n=16) and a delayed amputation group (surgery more than 72 hours after failed limb salvage, n=21). T test or χ2 test was used to compare the differences in incidence of postoperative complications, wound healing time, hospital stay, 6-month survival rate, and quality of life (SF-36) scores between the two groups. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors affecting prognosis.

Results

The total postoperative complication rates in the early amputation group and the delayed amputation group were 31.25% and 66.67% respectively, with a statistically significant difference (χ2=5.231, P < 0.05). The wound healing time and hospital stay in the early amputation group were (28.6±5.2) days and (35.2±8.7) days respectively, while those in the delayed amputation group were (42.5±7.8) days and (52.6±10.3) days, respectively. The differences were statistically significant between the two groups (t=6.325, 5.871; P < 0.01). At 6 months after surgery, the survival rate and quality of life score in the early amputation group were 93.75% and (68.5±10.2) points, respectively, while those in the delayed amputation group were 71.43% and (52.3±8.6) points, respectively. The differences were statistically significant between the two groups (χ2=3.968, t=5.124; P < 0.05 or P < 0.01). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that delayed amputation timing, preoperative severe infection, and poor nutritional status were independent risk factors for poor prognosis (OR=3.852, 4.218, 3.526; 95%CI: 1.215~12.163, 1.356~13.132, 1.087~11.445; P < 0.05).

Conclusion

For elderly patients with diabetic foot after failed limb salvage therapy, early amputation (within 72 hours) under relatively stable conditions can reduce the incidence of postoperative complications, shorten wound healing time and hospital stay, and improve survival rates and quality of life, making it worthy of clinical promotion.

表1 早期截肢和延迟截肢老年糖尿病患者生活质量的比较(±s
表2 影响老年糖尿病足截肢患者预后危险因素的多因素Logistic回归分析
[1]
中华医学会糖尿病学分会.中国2型糖尿病防治指南(2020年版)[J].中华糖尿病杂志202113(4):315-409.
[2]
Chen L, Ma W, Chen D, et al. Association of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and wound healing in patients with diabetic foot ulcers[J]. Chin Med J (Engl), 2022, 135(1):110-112.
[3]
曹仁颐.血糖异常老年人的心血管病:ADA与WHO糖尿病诊断标准的比较[J].国外医学(内分泌学分册)200020(6):328-329.
[4]
王富军.中国糖尿病足防治指南(2019版)解读[J].河北医科大学学报201940(11):1241-124.
[5]
王雷,杨慧,李盖,等.关于国际糖尿病足工作组/美国感染病学会《糖尿病患者足部感染诊治指南(2023版)》的更新与解读[J].中华糖尿病杂志202416(1):38-42.
[6]
贾赤宇,张泽鑫,尹斌.保肢还是截肢:论重症糖尿病足治疗的临床思维与决策[J].中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版)202318(1):10-15.
[7]
Singh N, Armstrong DG, Lipsky BA. Preventing foot ulcers in patients with diabetes[J]. JAMA, 2005, 293(2): 217-228.
[8]
Qu F, Shi Q, Wang Y, et al. Visit-to-visit glycated hemoglobin A1c variability in adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Chin Med J (Engl), 2022, 135(19):2294-2300.
[9]
梁志军,岳学锋,谢晓敏,等. 新型多学科协作医护联合管理模式在糖尿病足诊疗中的效果[J].宁夏医学杂志202042(8):712-714.
[10]
Bakker K, Apelqvist J, Schaper NC. Practical guidelines on the management and prevention of the diabetic foot 2011[J]. Diabetes Metab Res Rev, 2012, 28(Suppl 1):225-231.
[11]
苏慧娜,姚小杰,赵婷,等.探究不同病情程度糖尿病足感染患者血清炎症因子水平及血清CRP、Cys-C水平变化的临床意义[J].糖尿病新世界202528(3):42-45.
[1] 罗兵, 董凤群, 牛艺臻, 王锟, 程志华, 刘宏强. 胎儿超声心动图在单纯性肺动脉瓣狭窄及预后评估中的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2025, 22(08): 740-747.
[2] 姜玉峰, 曹建春, 黄天一, 李炳辉, 杨立民, 吕国忠, 曹烨民, 徐旭英, 阙华发, 韩春茂, 魏在荣, 王肖南, 黄跃生. 拔毒生肌散对糖尿病足溃疡治疗效果的多中心随机平行对照研究[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2025, 20(06): 490-498.
[3] 贺雅莉, 黄丽, 杨培娟. 功能保留手术在低位直肠癌治疗中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 701-704.
[4] 杨志, 夏雪峰, 管文贤. DeepSurv深度学习模型辅助胃癌术后精准化疗策略研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 501-505.
[5] 徐其银, 韩尚志. 术前结合术后营养支持对直肠癌患者康复的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 543-546.
[6] 张聪, 李成. 胰头区恶性肿瘤外科手术预后现状及相关因素的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 574-578.
[7] 田超, 黄若曦, 蒋茂林, 谢崇伟, 刁鹏飞, 钟苏权, 陈东, 王航涛, 陈桂柳, 陈虞娟, 李国良. 不同亚型前列腺癌新辅助化疗后盆腔淋巴结转移的风险因素及时间分布[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 727-735.
[8] 陈育纯, 王倩倩, 彭天明, 李勇, 田凯文, 刘志烨, 吴坤林, 蒲小勇, 刘久敏. 基于GEO数据库探究前列腺癌淋巴结转移和内脏转移中基因差异及预后[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 579-585.
[9] 腾鹏, 田景昌, 鄂春翔, 向阳, 田伯宇. 肌层浸润性膀胱癌患者根治性膀胱切除术预后列线图模型的构建及验证[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 645-652.
[10] 李群, 赵贺红, 王俊轶, 陈锋, 沈剑. 白细胞介素-18结合蛋白对特发性肺纤维化预后的临床意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(05): 708-713.
[11] 杨刚, 黄徐建, 朱建交, 熊永福, 李敬东. 两种不同类型肝门周围胆管癌临床病理特征及生存预后[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(06): 931-938.
[12] 吴刚, 严燃星, 严鑫, 阎婧, 何跃明, 朱倩. 基于血清和组织外泌体多组学分析筛选胰腺癌诊断和预后标志物[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(06): 962-972.
[13] 韩博, 崔宏帅, 鞠倩, 张琳. 不同吻合方式在结肠癌腹腔镜右半结肠切除术中的应用效果及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(05): 431-435.
[14] 周厚宁, 崔巧玲, 付瑞标. 营养风险指数、营养控制状态评分和尿素肌酐比值对胃癌患者营养和预后的评价[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(05): 444-448.
[15] 高兴梅, 周洁容, 杨溢, 张孟祥, 张仲谋, 李斌. 重症肺炎患者血磷水平轨迹与短期预后之间的关系[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(07): 479-485.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?