切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华老年病研究电子杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (02) : 44 -49. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8757.2024.02.009

综述

短时程脊髓电刺激治疗老年带状疱疹性神经痛研究进展
金贾力1, 张文平2, 冯智英3,()   
  1. 1. 310003 杭州,浙江大学医学院附属第一医院疼痛科;314400 嘉兴,海宁市中心医院麻醉科
    2. 310018 杭州,浙江理工大学生命科学与医药学院
    3. 310003 杭州,浙江大学医学院附属第一医院疼痛科
  • 收稿日期:2024-03-01 出版日期:2024-05-28
  • 通信作者: 冯智英
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(82271239); 浙江省科技厅领雁研发攻关计划项目(2022C03081); 浙江省卫生健康重大科技计划项目(WKJ-ZJ-2404)

Advences in short-term spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of zoster-associated pain in the elderly

Jiali Jin1, Wenping Zhang2, Zhiying Feng3,()   

  1. 1. Department of Pain Management, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China; Department of Anesthesiology, Haining Central Hospital, Jiaxing 314400, China
    2. College of Life Sciences and Medicine, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China
    3. Department of Pain Management, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China
  • Received:2024-03-01 Published:2024-05-28
  • Corresponding author: Zhiying Feng
引用本文:

金贾力, 张文平, 冯智英. 短时程脊髓电刺激治疗老年带状疱疹性神经痛研究进展[J]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2024, 11(02): 44-49.

Jiali Jin, Wenping Zhang, Zhiying Feng. Advences in short-term spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of zoster-associated pain in the elderly[J]. Chinese Journal of Geriatrics Research(Electronic Edition), 2024, 11(02): 44-49.

带状疱疹病毒侵犯神经等组织引起带状疱疹性疼痛,尤其好发于老年人及免疫力低下人群。现有的药物和常规治疗手段,对部分患者的疗效欠佳,严重影响了患者的生活质量。脊髓电刺激作为一种神经调控疗法,具有微创、并发症低和可调节性强等优点,已成为长期控制疼痛的有效手段。本文结合近年来有关脊髓电刺激和带状疱疹性疼痛的文献报道,对短时程脊髓电刺激治疗带状疱疹性神经痛的推荐应用人群、应用时机、临床疗效进行总结,并分析影响脊髓电刺激疗效的因素,供临床参考。

Herpes zoster virus invades nerves and other tissues, causing herpes zoster pain, which is particularly prevalent among the elderly and immunocompromised individuals. Current medications and conventional treatments are ineffective for some patients, significantly affecting their quality of life. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS), a neuromodulation therapy, has emerged as an effective long-term pain management strategy due to its minimally invasive nature, low complication rates, and high adjustability. This paper reviews recent literature on SCS and herpes zoster pain, summarizing the recommended patient population, optimal timing of application, and clinical effectiveness of short-term SCS in the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia. Additionally, factors influencing the effectiveness of SCS are analyzed to provide reference for clinical practice.

[1]
Kawai K, Gebremeskel BG, Acosta CJ. Systematic review of incidence and complications of herpes zoster: Towards a global perspective[J/OL]. BMJ Open, 2014, 4(6):e004833.
[2]
中华医学会皮肤性病学分会,中国康复医学会皮肤病康复专业委员会,中国中西医结合学会皮肤性病学分会,等.老年带状疱疹诊疗专家共识[J].中华皮肤科杂志202356(2):97-104.
[3]
Koshy E, Mengting L, Kumar H, et al. Epidemiology, treatment and prevention of herpes zoster: A comprehensive review[J]. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol, 2018, 84(3):251-262.
[4]
中国医师协会皮肤科医师分会带状疱疹专家共识工作组,国家皮肤与免疫疾病临床医学研究中心. 中国带状疱疹诊疗专家共识(2022版)[J].中华皮肤科杂志202255(12)1033-1041.
[5]
《中华医学杂志》社皮肤科慢病能力提升项目专家组,中国医师协会疼痛科医师分会,国家远程医疗与互联网医学中心皮肤科专业委员会.带状疱疹相关性疼痛全程管理专家共识[J].中华皮肤科杂志202154(10):841-846.
[6]
Isagulyan E, Tkachenko V, Semenov D, et al. The effectiveness of various types of electrical stimulation of the spinal cord for chronic pain in patients with postherpetic neuralgia: A literature review[J]. Pain Res Management, 2023, 2023:1-8.
[7]
毛天艺,肖喻,方木平.带状疱疹后神经痛的危险因素及其列线图预测模型[J].中国现代医生202361(16):18-22.
[8]
刘星,樊碧发,李怡帆,等.带状疱疹后神经痛发生的影响因素及临床预测模型构建[J].中国疼痛医学杂志202228(2):106-112.
[9]
杨琦魁.带状疱疹住院病例回顾性分析及带状疱疹后神经痛危险因素研究[D].昆明:云南中医药大学,2023.
[10]
谢和宾,曾鸿,田立红,等.带状疱疹后神经痛危险因素的Meta分析[J].中国疼痛医学杂志202026(4):304-307.
[11]
张丽君,毕晓东,徐全晓.带状疱疹后神经痛危险因素及GCH1基因多态性[J].中华医院感染学杂志202131(6):871-875.
[12]
Wang T, Fei Y, Yao M, et al. Correlation between galectin-3 and early herpes zoster neuralgia and postherpetic neuralgia: A retrospective clinical observation[J/OL]. Pain Res Management, 2020, 2020:8730918.
[13]
Liang X, Fan Y. Bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis reveals a causal effect of interleukin-18 levels on postherpetic neuralgia risk[J/OL]. Front Immunol, 2023, 14: 1183378.
[14]
黄佳彬,杨少敏,孙武平,等.短时程脊髓电刺激对不同病程带状疱疹性神经痛的疗效分析[J].中国疼痛医学杂志201925(10):749-757.
[15]
齐运杰,张璐莎,张紫琪,等.早期应用脊髓电刺激治疗带状疱疹相关性疼痛的疗效分析[J].中国疼痛医学杂志202329(2):149-152.
[16]
孙承红,杨小龙,董庆鹏,等.短时程脊髓电刺激治疗亚急性带状疱疹神经痛[J].中国疼痛医学杂志202127(4):308-311.
[17]
Liu B, Yang Y, Zhang Z, et al. Clinical study of spinal cord stimulation and pulsed radiofrequency for management of herpes zoster-related pain persisting beyond acute phase in elderly patients[J]. Pain Physician, 2020, 23(3):263-270.
[18]
王蕊,孙明洁,于洋,等.脉冲射频与短时程脊髓电刺激治疗带状疱疹后神经痛的比较研究[J].中国疼痛医学杂志201925(11):831-836.
[19]
韩健,王哲银,黎嘉雅.脊髓电刺激和背根神经节脉冲射频术治疗带状疱疹后神经痛的优劣差异[J].中国医药科学20199(3):29-32.
[20]
马应红.临时脊髓电刺激和脉冲射频治疗不同时期带状疱疹相关神经痛的疗效及其影响因素分析[D].广州:广州医科大学,2018.
[21]
罗奇,李鹏,王宇,等.短时程脊髓电刺激对带状疱疹后神经痛的临床疗效观察[J].中国疼痛医学杂志202026(6):472-475.
[22]
Kurklinsky S, Palmer SC, Arroliga MJ, et al. Neuromodulation in postherpetic neuralgia: Case reports and review of the literature[J]. Pain Med, 2018, 19(6): 1237-1244.
[23]
张景卫,蒋文臣,王准,等.短时程脊髓电刺激治疗带状疱疹后神经痛效果不佳的影响因素分析[J].中华麻醉学杂志202343(5):575-579.
[24]
Du P, Ma L, Ding W. The influence of ossification morphology on surgery outcomes in patients with thoracic ossification of ligamentum flavum (TOLF)[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2022, 17(1):229.
[25]
Meacham K, Shepherd A, Mohapatra DP, et al. Neuropathic pain: Central vs. peripheral mechanisms[J]. Curr Pain Headache Rep, 2017, 21(6):28.
[26]
张文静,刘鎏,王珺楠,等.短时程脊髓电刺激治疗带状疱疹相关性神经痛预后分析[J].中国疼痛医学杂志202329(4):258-267.
[27]
Peng Z, Guo J, Zhang Y, et al. Development of a model for predicting the effectiveness of pulsed radiofrequency on zoster-associated pain[J]. Pain Ther, 2022, 11(1):253-267.
[28]
Miller JP, Eldabe S, Buchser E, et al. Parameters of spinal cord stimulation and their role in electrical charge delivery: A review[J]. Neuromodulation, 2016, 19(4):373-384.
[29]
胡慧敏,毛鹏,李怡帆,等.高频和低频脊髓电刺激治疗慢性疼痛有效性和安全性比较的Meta分析[J].中国疼痛医学杂志202228(3):225-229.
[30]
Kapural L, Yu C, Doust MW, et al. Novel 10-kHz high-frequency therapy (HF10 therapy) is superior to traditional low-frequency spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic back and leg pain[J]. Anesthesiology, 2015, 123(4):851-860.
[31]
Kapural L, Yu C, Doust MW, et al. Comparison of 10-kHz high-frequency and traditional low-frequency spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic back and leg pain: 24-month results from a multicenter, randomized, controlled pivotal trial[J]. Neurosurgery, 2016, 79(5):667-677.
[32]
Al-Kaisy A, Van Buyten JP, Smet I, et al. Sustained effectiveness of 10 kHz high-frequency spinal cord stimulation for patients with chronic, low back pain: 24-month results of a prospective multicenter study[J]. Pain Med, 2014, 15(3):347-354.
[33]
De Ridder D, Vanneste S, Plazier M, et al. Burst spinal cord stimulation: Toward paresthesia-free pain suppression[J]. Neurosurgery, 2010, 66(5):986-990.
[34]
Lee YJ, Kong MH, Choi SS, et al. Burst stimulation of the thoracic spinal cord near a cardiac pacemaker in an elderly patient with postherpetic neuralgia: A case report[J]. Medicina, 2021, 57(4):337.
[35]
De Ridder D, Plazier M, Kamerling N, et al. Burst spinal cord stimulation for limb and back pain[J]. World Neurosurg, 2013, 80(5):642-649.
[36]
Deer TR, Grigsby E, Weiner RL, et al. A prospective study of dorsal root ganglion stimulation for the relief of chronic pain[J]. Neuromodulation, 2013, 16(1):67-72.
[37]
Deer TR, Levy RM, Kramer J, et al. Dorsal root ganglion stimulation yielded higher treatment success rate for complex regional pain syndrome and causalgia at 3 and 12 months: A randomized comparative trial[J]. Pain, 2017, 158(4):669-681.
[38]
Piedade GS, Vesper J, Chatzikalfas A, et al. Cervical and high-thoracic dorsal root ganglion stimulation in chronic neuropathic pain[J]. Neuromodulation, 2019, 22(8):951-955.
[39]
Kim JH, Apigo A, Fontaine C. Dorsal root ganglion stimulation for refractory post-herpetic neuralgia[J]. Pain Pract, 2021, 21(7):794-798.
[40]
王晓雷,许继军,程建国,等.脊髓电刺激治疗慢性疼痛新进展[J].中国疼痛医学杂志201925(6):452-455.
[1] 韩婧, 郝少龙, 康骅. 北京市单中心甲状腺癌患者临床特征的回顾分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 490-493.
[2] 陈文进, 张月君, 王传泰. 腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术后肠梗阻发生的影响因素研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 389-392.
[3] 谢丽春, 欧庆芬, 张秋萍, 叶升. 简化和标准肝脏MRI方案在结直肠癌肝转移患者随访中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 434-437.
[4] 兰华, 高丽莎, 申明, 张铭光. 内镜黏膜下剥离术后溃疡出血的研究进展[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 467-469.
[5] 刘明昊, 李晨, 王冰, 万政, 田文. 机器人与腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术对比研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 376-382.
[6] 孙红燕, 李娟. 造口旁疝患者生活质量的影响因素分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 273-276.
[7] 肖家全, 张勇, 严伟. 经腹腹膜前与完全腹膜外疝修补术对腹股沟斜疝的临床疗效[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 302-306.
[8] 唐虹, 周奇, 欧阳晓玲, 王永峰, 华宇, 郝小白, 李林霞. 腹膜外无张力吊带子宫悬吊术治疗盆腔脏器脱垂的疗效[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 315-319.
[9] 危用洋, 黄俊甫, 辛万鹏, 易思清, 涂书举, 方康, 李勇, 肖卫东. 三种术式治疗胰腺颈体部良性或低度恶性肿瘤的临床疗效分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 515-519.
[10] 王凯飞, 牟怡平, 李晓辉, 王瑞涛, 侯惠莲, 张月浪. 原发性肝平滑肌肉瘤临床病理特征及疗效分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 357-362.
[11] 黄福秀, 张宁宁, 李晨阳, 李淑玲, 陈超. 单纯电切、单纯电凝与电凝电切术对扁平肠息肉疗效及不良事件发生率的影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 310-314.
[12] 陶金华, 陈珊珊, 陈晓四. 阿帕替尼联合替吉奥治疗晚期食管癌的疗效与安全性影响因素评价[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 325-329.
[13] 周敏, 张仁清, 卢贤红. 秋泻灵联合双歧杆菌三联活菌散对轮状病毒腹泻患儿免疫功能、心肌酶和C反应蛋白的影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 365-368.
[14] 胡云鹤, 周玉焯, 付瑞瑛, 于凡, 李爱东. CHS-DRG付费制度下GB1分组住院费用影响因素分析与管理策略探讨[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 568-574.
[15] 袁捷, 乔钰琪, 李彦冬. 二甲双胍、来曲唑联合地屈孕酮治疗多囊卵巢综合征合并不孕症的效果评价[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 343-347.
阅读次数
全文


摘要