切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华老年病研究电子杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (02) : 1 -4. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8757.2024.02.001

临床研究

改良Morse跌倒评估量表对老年住院患者跌倒风险的预测价值
曹娟1, 朱亚1,(), 吴玉泉1,(), 胡旭钢1, 董芳1, 洪逸莲1, 桂莹1   
  1. 1. 310013 杭州,中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九〇三医院老年病诊治中心
  • 收稿日期:2023-12-15 出版日期:2024-05-28
  • 通信作者: 朱亚, 吴玉泉
  • 基金资助:
    杭州市医药卫生科技项目(B20200469)

The predictive value of modified Morse scale for falls risk in elderly inpatients

Juan Cao1, Ya Zhu1,(), Yuquan Wu1,(), Xugang Hu1, Fang Dong1, Yilian Hong1, Ying Gui1   

  1. 1. Elderly Disease Diagnosis and Treatment Center, the 903th Hospital of Joint Support Force of PLA, Hangzhou 310013, China
  • Received:2023-12-15 Published:2024-05-28
  • Corresponding author: Ya Zhu, Yuquan Wu
引用本文:

曹娟, 朱亚, 吴玉泉, 胡旭钢, 董芳, 洪逸莲, 桂莹. 改良Morse跌倒评估量表对老年住院患者跌倒风险的预测价值[J]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2024, 11(02): 1-4.

Juan Cao, Ya Zhu, Yuquan Wu, Xugang Hu, Fang Dong, Yilian Hong, Ying Gui. The predictive value of modified Morse scale for falls risk in elderly inpatients[J]. Chinese Journal of Geriatrics Research(Electronic Edition), 2024, 11(02): 1-4.

目的

探讨改良Morse跌倒风险评估量表对老年住院患者跌倒风险的预测价值。

方法

选取2020年6月至2021年12月中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九〇三医院老年病诊治中心接诊且经老年综合评估(CGA)软件筛查的老年患者238例,其中包括48例跌倒患者。对比改良前后的Morse跌倒风险评估量表预测高危跌倒人群的情况,并利用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线比较量表预测跌倒风险的曲线下面积(AUC)、灵敏度、特异度和约登指数等。

结果

Morse跌倒风险评估量表结果显示,跌倒高风险86例,中风险109例,低风险43例;改良Morse跌倒风险评估量表结果显示,跌倒高风险86例,中风险111例,低风险41例。48例跌倒患者改良前及改良后的评分均高于未跌倒患者(P<0.01),但改良后量表评估为中风险患者的占比较改良前上升改良前后分别为6.42%和8.10%),而低风险患者的占比下降改良前后分别为11.63%和7.31%),高风险患者占比无变化。ROC曲线分析结果显示,Morse跌倒风险评估量表预测跌倒的AUC为0.828(95%CI:0.773~0.873,P<0.01),改良Morse跌倒风险评估量表的AUC提升至0.848(95%CI:0.795~0.891,P<0.01),但两者的差异无统计学意义(Z=1.116,P>0.05)。Morse跌倒风险评估量表的灵敏度为64.58%,特异度为95.79%,约登指数为0.604;改良Morse跌倒风险评估量表的灵敏度为60.42%,特异度为97.89%,约登指数为0.583。

结论

基于CGA改良后的Morse跌倒风险评估量表可在一定程度上提高跌倒风险预警的准确性。

Objective

To improve the Morse Fall Risk Assessment Scale using the Geriatric Comprehensive Assessment (CGA) technique and explore its role in fall risk management for elderly hospitalized patients.

Methods

From June 2020 to December 2021, our center admitted 238 patients who completed the Morse Fall Assessment Scale and Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) software screening, including 48 patients with falls. Compare the Morse Fall Risk Assessment Scale before and after improvement to predict high-risk fall populations, and use receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to compare the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and Jordan index of the scale in predicting fall risk.

Results

According to the Morse Fall Risk Assessment Scale, among the 238 patients, 86 were of high risk of falling, 109 were of medium risk, and 43 were of low risk; According to the modified Morse Fall Risk Assessment Scale, among the 238 patients, 86 were of high risk of falling, 111 were of medium risk, and 41 were of low risk.The scores of 48 fall patients before and after improvement were higher than those of non fall patients (P < 0.01), but the proportion of medium risk patients evaluated by the improved scale increased compared to before improvement (6.42% and 8.10% respectively), while the proportion of low-risk patients decreased (11.63% and 7.31% respectively), and the proportion of high-risk patients remained unchanged. The ROC curve analysis results showed that the AUC of the Morse Fall Risk Scoring Scale for predicting falls was 0.828 (95%CI: 0.773-0.873, P < 0.01), and the AUC of the modified Morse Fall Risk Scoring Scale was improved to 0.848 (95%CI: 0.795-0.891, P < 0.01), but the difference between the two was not statistically significant (Z=1.116, P > 0.05). The sensitivity of the Morse Fall Risk Scoring Scale was 64.58%, the specificity was 95.79%, and the Youden index was 0.604; The sensitivity of the modified Morse Fall Risk Scoring Scale was 60.42%, the specificity was 97.89%, and the Youden index was 0.583.

Conclusion

The Morse Fall Risk Assessment Scale, improved based on CGA, can improve the accuracy of fall risk prediction.

表1 Morse跌倒风险评估量表各分级患者跌倒发生及合并肌少症情况
表2 改良Morse跌倒风险评估量表各分级患者跌倒发生情况
图1 改良前后的Morse跌倒风险评估量表预测跌倒的受试者工作特征曲线
[1]
朱亚,曹娟,王明娥,等.下肢肌肉训练在肌少症老年患者髋部骨折围手术期应用研究[J].护理与康复202221(6):6-10.
[2]
吴延,王广玲,聂作婷,等.2022年版《世界指南:老年人跌倒的预防与管理》解读[J].中国全科医学202326(10):1159-1163.
[3]
Kim EA, Mordiffi SZ, Bee WH, et al.Evaluation of three fall-risk assessment tools in an acute care setting[J]. J Adv Nurs, 2007, 60(4):427-435.
[4]
张宁,白姣姣,张艳.老年肌少症护理评估的研究进展[J].护理学杂志201934(8):108-111.
[5]
Haines TP, Hill K, Walsh W, et al. Design-related bias in hospital fall risk screening tool predictive accuracy evaluations: Systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, 2007, 62(6):664-672.
[6]
黄慕妲,吴雪莲,林云玲,等.改良Morse跌倒评估量表的可行性分析[J].现代医院201414(11):10-11.
[7]
嵇加佳,戴曦,梅克文.改良版托马斯跌倒风险评估量表与Morse跌倒评估量表对老年住院病人跌倒的预测价值[J].实用老年医学201933(6):611-613.
[8]
胡惠菊,韩静.Morse跌倒评估量表与STEADI跌倒风险自评量表在养老机构老年人中的应用比较[J].护理学报202128(19):8-12.
[9]
刘娟,丁清清,周白瑜,等.中国老年人肌少症诊疗专家共识(2021)[J].中华老年医学杂志202140(8):943-952.
[10]
中华医学会骨质疏松和骨矿盐疾病分会.肌少症共识[J].中华骨质疏松和骨矿盐疾病杂志20169(3):215-227.
[11]
Beaudart C, Zaaria M, Pasleau F, et al. Health outcomes of sarcopenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J/OL]. PLoS One, 2017, 12(1):e0169548.
[12]
龙囡囡,吴玉泉,徐静,等.老年综合评估指导下的老年肌少症综合干预疗效分析[J/CD].中华老年病研究电子杂志20218(1):5-9.
[13]
徐双燕,姚梅琪,黄鑫,等.院内跌倒伤害预测模型构建及列线图开发[J].中国实用护理杂志202137(19):1468-1472.
[1] 杨霁, 黄顺梅, 王安鸽, 吴月, 杨云梅. 杭州地区老年人群中肌少症患病情况及其与骨质疏松症的相关性分析[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(03): 207-210.
[2] 庞亮月, 林焕彩. 人工智能在龋病诊疗中的应用[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 162-166.
[3] 陆婷, 陈浩, 王雪静, 谭若芸, 彭宇竹. 肾移植术后一年发生代谢综合征的危险因素分析[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 98-103.
[4] 徐艳, 江秀娟, 王超, 江圆满. 股直肌剪切波弹性成像对COPD并发肌少症的诊断意义[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 454-457.
[5] 周文欢, 杨黎. AECOPD低钠血症发生风险及预测因素分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 313-315.
[6] 黎倩, 何静, 李燕玲, 罗业涛, 徐婷, 吴敏, 王羚入. 卒中后吞咽障碍患者卒中相关性肺炎预测模型的构建[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(06): 793-798.
[7] 董力, 李赫妍, 魏文斌. 人工智能在糖尿病视网膜病变中的应用进展[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(01): 57-61.
[8] 邱红生, 林树体, 梁朝莹, 劳世高, 何荷. 模拟现实步态训练对膝关节前交叉韧带损伤的功能恢复及对跌倒恐惧的影响[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 343-350.
[9] 王宁, 刘彦哲, 吴紫莺, 曾超, 雷光华, 沙婷婷, 王伊伦. 基于孟德尔随机化研究探讨肠道菌群与肌少症表型的因果关联[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 333-342.
[10] 奚培培, 周加军. 慢性肾脏病患者肌少症机制和诊治的研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 491-495.
[11] 李冰冰, 张晓萌, 张艳. 住院患者跌倒风险评估工具及预测模型研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(11): 1192-1195.
[12] 王家圆, 王晓东. 消化系统恶性肿瘤相关肌少症的研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 823-827.
[13] 杨婷, 邱晓珏, 陈青雅, 张宝晶, 王伟伟. 经内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后胰腺炎预测模型的建立与评价[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2023, 10(03): 200-204.
[14] 解艳红, 陈凌燕, 邵晓露, 沈珊珊, 李方舟, 蓝肖燕. 老年住院患者衰弱风险预测模型研究进展[J]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2024, 11(01): 11-17.
[15] 刘晓梅, 罗永梅, 傅瑜. 基于信息化老年综合评估的多学科管理护理模式在脑梗死患者中的应用效果[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 255-264.
阅读次数
全文


摘要