切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华老年病研究电子杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (03) : 26 -30. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8757.2023.03.004

临床研究

个体化康复治疗胸腰椎骨质疏松性骨折合并腰背部软组织损伤疗效分析
张吉辉, 于亮, 顾勇杰, 叶森琦, 侯志鹏, 赵刘军()   
  1. 315040 浙江省宁波市第六医院脊柱外科
    315211 宁波大学医学院
  • 收稿日期:2022-12-24 出版日期:2023-08-28
  • 通信作者: 赵刘军
  • 基金资助:
    浙江省公益技术研究项目(LGF18C100004); 浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目(2022KY341); 宁波市自然科学基金项目(202003N4298)

Clinical study of individual rehabilitation on thoracolumbar osteoporotic fracture with low back soft tissue injury in thoracolumbar spine

Jihui Zhang, Liang Yu, Yongjie Gu, Senqi Ye, Zhipeng Hou, Liujun Zhao()   

  1. Department of Spinal Surgery, Ningbo No.6 Hospital, Ningbo 315040, China
    Ningbo University School of Medicine, Ningbo 315211, China
  • Received:2022-12-24 Published:2023-08-28
  • Corresponding author: Liujun Zhao
引用本文:

张吉辉, 于亮, 顾勇杰, 叶森琦, 侯志鹏, 赵刘军. 个体化康复治疗胸腰椎骨质疏松性骨折合并腰背部软组织损伤疗效分析[J]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2023, 10(03): 26-30.

Jihui Zhang, Liang Yu, Yongjie Gu, Senqi Ye, Zhipeng Hou, Liujun Zhao. Clinical study of individual rehabilitation on thoracolumbar osteoporotic fracture with low back soft tissue injury in thoracolumbar spine[J]. Chinese Journal of Geriatrics Research(Electronic Edition), 2023, 10(03): 26-30.

目的

探讨个体化康复治疗胸腰椎骨质疏松性骨折合并腰背部软组织损伤的疗效。

方法

选取2019年10月至2020年8月在宁波市第六医院行经皮椎体后凸成形术(PKP)治疗的胸腰椎骨质疏松性骨折合并腰背部软组织损伤患者52例。27例予常规康复治疗(对照组),25例在常规康复治疗的基础上增加个体化康复治疗(观察组)。术后12~24 h嘱患者主诉其疼痛缓解情况(好转、无变化或更坏),计算疼痛缓解率;采用腰部疼痛的视觉模拟评分(VAS)及Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)评估患者术后1 d、1个月和3个月时腰部疼痛及功能评分改善情况;术后3个月时复查磁共振评估患者软组织损伤改善情况。计量资料连续性时点的比较采用重复测量方差分析,计数资料的比较采用χ2检验。

结果

术后12~24 h,观察组疼痛缓解率明显高于对照组(χ2=13.254,P<0.05)。两组患者手术前后不同时点的VAS和ODI的比较均有组间效应(F=10.541、8.387,P<0.05);其中术后1、3个月,观察组患者腰部VAS及ODI评分的改善较对照组更明显(P<0.05)。术后3个月时,观察组好转优良率明显高于对照组(χ2=19.653,P<0.05)。

结论

个体化康复治疗可以促进胸腰椎骨质疏松性骨折合并腰背部软组织损伤患者的术后早期功能恢复,有效降低患者术后腰痛的发生率。

Objective

To explore the effect of individual rehabilitation on thoracolumbar osteoporotic fracture with soft tissue injury in thoracolumbar spine.

Methods

The clinical data of 52 patients with thoracolumbar osteoporotic fractures with low back soft tissue injury treated by percutaneous kyphoplasty were selected in Ningbo No.6 Hospital from October 2019 to August 2020. The control group (27 cases) received routine rehabilitation treatment, while the observation group (27 cases) added individualized rehabilitation treatment on the basis of routine rehabilitation treatment. Require patients to report their pain relief status (improvement, no change, or worse) 12 to 24 hours after surgery, and calculate the pain relief rate. The visual analogue score (VAS) of lumbar pain and Oswestry dysfunction index (ODI) were used to evaluate the improvement of lumbar pain and functional scores in patients at 1 day, 1 month, and 3 months after operation. At 3 months after surgery, magnetic resonance imaging was performed to assess the improvement of soft tissue injury. Repeated measurement analysis of variance was used for comparison of measurement data, and χ2 test was used for comparison of counting data.

Results

12 to 24 hours after surgery, the pain relief rate in the observation group was significantly higher than that of control group (χ2=13.254, P < 0.05). The comparison of VAS and ODI scores at different time points before and after operation between the two groups showed intergroup effect (F=10.541 and 8.387, P < 0.05). There were significant differences in lumbar VAS score and ODI index between the two groups 1 and 3 months after operation (P < 0.05). At 3 months after surgery, the improvement rate of observation group was significantly higher than that of control group (χ2=19.653, P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Individual rehabilitation treatment can promote the early postoperative functional recovery of patients with thoracolumbar osteoporotic fractures with low back soft tissue, and effectively reduce the incidence of postoperative low back pain.

表1 两组患者一般资料的比较
表2 两组患者腰部疼痛及功能的评分(±s
[1]
Li HK, Hao DJ, Yang JS, et al. Percutaneous kyphoplasty versus posterior spinal fixation with vertebroplasty for treatment of Kümmell disease: A case-control study with minimal 2-year follow-up[J/OL]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2017, 96(51):e9287.
[2]
Buchbinder R, Johnston RV, Rischin KJ, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2018, 4(4):CD006349.
[3]
Yang EZ, Xu JG, Huang GZ, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty versus conservative treatment in aged patients with acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: A prospective randomized controlled clinical study[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2016, 41(8):653-660.
[4]
Yang JS, Liu JJ, Chu L, et al. Causes of residual back pain at early stage after percutaneous vertebroplasty: A retrospective analysis of 1,316 cases[J/OL]. Pain Physician, 2019, 22(5):E495-E503.
[5]
杨俊松,陈浩,刘鹏,等.椎体成形术后早期腰背部残余疼痛的原因分析[J].中华骨科杂志202040(10):625-634.
[6]
徐小东,杨雨润,朱前拯,等.腰背部软组织损伤对重度骨质疏松患者经皮椎体成形术疗效的影响[J].中国骨质疏松杂志202127(5):717-720.
[7]
郭嘉炜,陈晓,苏佳灿.骨质疏松性骨折治疗面临的挑战和解决途径[J].中华创伤杂志202137(6):481-487.
[8]
Li YB, Zheng X, Wang R, et al. SPECT-CT versus MRI in localizing active lesions in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures[J]. Nucl Med Commun, 2018, 39(7):610-617.
[9]
Wei L, Zhang H, Li X, et al. Efficacy and safety evaluation of intravenous infusion of cervus and cucumis polypeptides for treatment of avascular necrosis of the femoral head: A randomized clinical trial[J]. J Tradit Chin Med, 2016, 36(1):39-44.
[10]
张文韫,冯艳,殷宝媚,等.手法联合核心稳定性训练治疗退变性腰椎失稳症的疗效观察[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志201840(2):137-139.
[11]
Afzal S, Dhar S, Vasavada NB, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic fractures[J]. Pain Physician, 2007, 10(4):559-563.
[12]
Voormolen MH, Lohle PN, Lampmann LE, et al. Prospective clinical follow-up after percutaneous vertebroplasty in patients with painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures[J]. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2006, 17(8):1313-1320.
[13]
谢艺才,李耀志,卢绍路,等.腰大肌及椎旁肌脂含量在退变性脊柱侧凸中的作用的影像学研究[J].临床放射学杂志201736(7):1013-1017.
[14]
司卫兵,秦卫,胡丹,等.腰背部软组织在椎体成形术治疗胸腰椎骨质疏松性骨折术后效果中的影响[J].中华创伤骨科杂志201820(2):142-146.
[15]
Yan Y, Xu R, Zou T. Is thoracolumbar fascia injury the cause of residual back pain after percutaneous vertebroplasty? A prospective cohort study[J]. Osteoporos Int, 2015, 26(3):1119-1124.
[16]
Capozzi A, Scambia G, Pedicelli A, et al. Clinical management of osteoporotic vertebral fracture treated with percutaneous vertebroplasty[J]. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab, 2017, 14(2):161-166.
[1] 中华医学会骨科学分会关节外科学组, 广东省医学会骨质疏松和骨矿盐疾病分会, 广东省佛山市顺德区第三人民医院. 中国髋部脆性骨折术后抗骨质疏松药物临床干预指南(2023年版)[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 751-764.
[2] 浦路桥, 徐永清, 齐保闯, 施洪鑫, 林玮, 卜鹏飞, 白艳, 唐志方, 李川. 中国髋部脆性骨折术后抗骨质疏松药物临床干预指南(2023年版)计划书[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 747-750.
[3] 王岩, 马剑雄, 郎爽, 董本超, 田爱现, 李岩, 孙磊, 靳洪震, 卢斌, 王颖, 柏豪豪, 马信龙. 外泌体在骨质疏松症诊疗中应用的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 673-678.
[4] 王泽勇, 覃健. 白细胞含量对富血小板血浆治疗运动系统损伤的影响[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 684-688.
[5] 杨霁, 黄顺梅, 王安鸽, 吴月, 杨云梅. 杭州地区老年人群中肌少症患病情况及其与骨质疏松症的相关性分析[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(03): 207-210.
[6] 陆宜仙, 张震涛, 夏德萌, 王家林. 巨噬细胞极化在骨质疏松中调控作用及机制的研究进展[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 538-541.
[7] 陈跃圻, 罗睿, 向涵, 余泳妍, 余挺. 骨质疏松症与牙周炎的因果关系:一项两样本孟德尔随机化研究[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 292-298.
[8] 南方护骨联盟前列腺癌骨转移专家组. 前列腺癌骨转移诊疗专家共识(2023版)[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 201-208.
[9] 蒋正东, 李徐奇, 王曙逢, 魏光兵. 复发性腹股沟疝的腹腔镜手术策略及疗效观察[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 539-543.
[10] 宋红霞, 杨英, 陈芳. 老年COPD患者并发骨质疏松症相关危险因素的研究进展[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(06): 895-898.
[11] 阎凯, 付雍, 章正涛, 卢文峰, 王毅州, 巫国谊, 张海斌. 中晚期肝癌疗效预测模型暨肝癌类器官模型研究进展[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 348-351.
[12] 钟东. 大脑凸面脑膜瘤的个体化全程管理[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(04): 193-198.
[13] 金浪, 石洁, 黄正, 贾永伟, 张建坡, 魏礼成, 金昊雷. 3D打印数字技术辅助改良交叉PVP对重度骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折脊柱-骨盆矢状面平衡状态的影响[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 263-268.
[14] 王娟, 高俊, 周伊兰, 李小红, 史兵伟, 潘美珍. 血清IL-2、IL-17和骨密度关系及其对骨质疏松症的预测价值[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 295-300.
[15] 顾国英, 黄迎春, 刘佳, 居建明, 于国锋, 蒋荣. 个体化肠外营养在肠切除伴肠功能障碍患者中的应用研究[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 489-493.
阅读次数
全文


摘要