构建老年人内在能力综合评价指标体系，为老年人内在能力综合情况的评定提供科学依据。

以健康老龄化相关研究为理论基础，通过文献分析法构建初级条目池，采用德尔菲法专家咨询确立指标条目，运用层次分析法确定指标权重，形成老年人内在能力综合评价指标体系。

遴选邀请18名专家进行函询，专家问卷有效回收率分别为88.89%、93.75%，专家权威系数分别为0.882、0.900，肯德尔和谐系数分别为0.225、0.227。通过两轮函询构建了老年人内在能力综合评价指标体系，包括5个一级指标、14个二级指标。一级指标的权重从高到低依次为认知功能（0.310）、移动能力（0.184）、视力听力（0.183）、心理社会（0.172）、机体活力（0.151）；其中认知功能对应的二级指标权重依次为时间与空间定向（0.116）、记忆力（0.072）、语言能力（0.064）、计算力（0.058），视力听力对应的二级指标权重依次为视力障碍（0.091）、听力障碍（0.091），移动能力对应的二级指标权重依次为行动受限（0.107）、跌倒风险（0.076），心理社会对应的二级指标权重依次为主观感知社会隔离（0.067）、兴趣减退（0.056）、情绪低落（0.050），机体活力对应的二级指标权重依次为营养不良（0.062）、口腔衰弱（0.050）、食欲减退（0.040）。

本研究初步构建了老年人内在能力综合评价指标，为综合评价老年人内在能力提供了可行方案，也为未来基于综合评价进行及早干预奠定了基础。

To construct a scoring system for assessing intrinsic capacity in older adults, thus to provide scientific guidance on defining the intrinsic capacity among older adults.

Adopting the theoretical concepts from previous research on healthy aging, the primary set of indexes is constructed through literature analysis. And the content of intrinsic capacity evaluation index system for older adults is determined through Delphi experts consultation. The weighted values of the evaluation indexes are established by the analytic hierarchy process.

Eighteen experts were selected and invited for correspondence consultation. The effective recovery rates of the questionnaires were 88.89% and 93.75%, the expert authority coefficients were 0.882 and 0.900, and the Kendall harmony coefficients were 0.225 and 0.227. After a two-rounded Delphi experts consultation involving 18 experts, an intrinsic capacity evaluation index system for older adults was established, including five first level indexes and 14 secondary indexes. The weights of primary indicators were as follows: cognitive function (0.310), mobility (0.184), vision and hearing (0.183), psycho-social (0.172), and vitality (0.151). The corresponding secondary indicators of cognitive function were time and spatial orientation (0.116), memory (0.072), language ability (0.064), calculate ability (0.058). The corresponding secondary indicators of vision and hearing were visual impairment (0.091), hearing impairment (0.091).The weights of the secondary indicators corresponding to mobility were movement restriction (0.107) and fall risk (0.076). The corresponding secondary index weights of psycho-social were subjective perceived social isolation (0.067), loss of interest (0.056), and depressed (0.050). The corresponding secondary indicators of vitality were malnutrition (0.062), oral frailty (0.050), loss of appetite (0.040).

A comprehensive evaluation index for the intrinsic capacity of the older adults was established, which provides the scheme for comprehensive evaluation of the intrinsic capacity of the older adults, and provides possibility for early intervention based on comprehensive evaluation in the older adults.