切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华老年病研究电子杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (03) : 12 -16. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8757.2022.02.003

老年心血管病

老年急性冠脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入术后新发心肌梗死影响因素分析
靳英1, 张伟1, 尹巧香1, 段景琪1, 张蓝宁1, 曹艳杰1,()   
  1. 1. 100141 北京,中国人民解放军空军特色医学中心老年医学科
  • 收稿日期:2021-09-17 出版日期:2022-08-28
  • 通信作者: 曹艳杰
  • 基金资助:
    军委后勤保障部卫生保健专项课题(18BJZ07)

Influencing factors for new myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome

Ying Jin1, Wei Zhang1, Qiaoxiang Yin1, Jinqi Duan1, Lanning Zhang1, Yanjie Cao1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Geriatrics, Air Force Medical Center, People's Liberation Army of China, Beijing 100141, China
  • Received:2021-09-17 Published:2022-08-28
  • Corresponding author: Yanjie Cao
引用本文:

靳英, 张伟, 尹巧香, 段景琪, 张蓝宁, 曹艳杰. 老年急性冠脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入术后新发心肌梗死影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2022, 09(03): 12-16.

Ying Jin, Wei Zhang, Qiaoxiang Yin, Jinqi Duan, Lanning Zhang, Yanjie Cao. Influencing factors for new myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Geriatrics Research(Electronic Edition), 2022, 09(03): 12-16.

目的

探讨老年急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者经皮冠状动脉介入术(PCI)后新发心肌梗死的影响因素。

方法

选取2019年2月至2020年2月中国人民解放军空军特色医学中心收治的PCI后发生心肌梗死的老年ACS患者61例纳入新发心梗组,另择同期收治的PCI后未发生心肌梗死的老年ACS患者61例纳入无新发心梗组。先行单因素分析(包括χ2检验、t检验、秩和检验)比较两组患者的临床资料,再将有意义的指标纳入多因素logistic回归模型进一步分析。

结果

新发心肌梗死患者合并高血压控制不良比例及纤维蛋白原、基质金属蛋白酶-9(MMP-9)水平均高于无新发心肌梗死患者,白蛋白水平低于无新发心肌梗死患者,差异均具有统计学意义(χ2=14.226,Z=7.699,t=3.142、5.464,P<0.01)。多因素logistic回归分析结果显示,合并高血压控制不良、纤维蛋白原水平高、MMP-9高表达是老年ACS患者PCI后新发心肌梗死的危险因素(OR=7.559、5.169、1.024,95%CI=1.034-55.271、2.624-10.183、1.003-1.046,P<0.05或0.01),白蛋白水平高是其保护因素(OR=0.752,95%CI=0.652-0.867,P<0.01)。

结论

高血压者血压控制不良、纤维蛋白原高水平、MMP-9高表达及白蛋白低水平可能是老年ACS患者PCI后新发心肌梗死的危险因素。

Objective

To analyze the influencing factors of new myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

Methods

The medical records from February 2019 to February 2020 were collected from the Air Force Medical Center, People's Liberation Army of China. Sixty-one patients were included in the new myocardial infarction group and 61 patients were included in the no new myocardial infarction group. The influencing factors of new myocardial infarction after PCI in elderly patients with ACS were explored through univariate (including χ2 test, t test and rank-sum test) and multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Results

The rate of poor blood pressure control, levels of fibrinogen, matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) were higher, and the level of albumin was lower in patients with new myocardial infarction (χ2=14.226; Z=7.699; t=3.142, 5.464; P < 0.01). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that poor blood pressure control, high level of fibrinogen and high expression of MMP-9 were the risk factors of new myocardial infarction after PCI in elderly ACS patients (OR=7.559, 5.169, 1.024; 95%CI=1.034-55.271, 2.624-10.183, 1.003-1.046; P < 0.05 or P < 0.01), and high level of albumin was the protective factor (OR=0.752, 95%CI=0.652-0.867, P < 0.01).

Conclusion

Poor blood pressure control of hypertension, high fibrinogen level, high expression of MMP-9 and low albumin level may be the risk factors of new myocardial infarction after PCI in elderly ACS patients.

表1 老年急性冠脉综合征患者经皮冠脉介入术后新发心肌梗死的单因素分析结果[MP25P75)或±s]
表2 老年急性冠脉综合征患者经皮穿刺冠脉介入术后新发心肌梗死的多因素logistic回归分析结果
[1]
Kubo S, Yamaji K, Inohara T, et al. In-hospital outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome with cardiogenic shock (from a Japanese nationwide registry [J-PCI registry])[J]. Am J Cardiol, 2019, 123(10):1595-1601.
[2]
孙阳阳,隋萍,刘晓红,等.急性冠脉综合征患者PCI术后1年发生不良心血管事件风险预测模型的构建及评价[J].护理学报202027(19):11-16.
[3]
李云鸿,杜书敏,段宗刚,等.PCI术后非ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征患者再发不良心血管事件的危险因素分析[J].贵州医科大学学报202045(5):573-578.
[4]
刘琛,李凤德,杨红红.老年急性心肌梗死再发的现状调查及影响因素分析[J].心肺血管病杂志202039(10):1188-1192.
[5]
葛均波,徐永健,王辰.内科学[M].9版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2018:229-245.
[6]
中华医学会心血管病学分会介入心脏病学组,中国医师协会心血管内科医师分会,血栓防治专业委员会,等.中国经皮冠状动脉介入治疗指南(2016)[J].中华心血管病杂志201644(5):382-400.
[7]
Song J, Murugiah K, Hu S, et al.Incidence, predictors, and prognostic impact of recurrent acute myocardial infarction in China[J]. Heart, 2020, 107(4):313-318.
[8]
Qin Y, Wei X, Han H, et al. Association between age and readmission after percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction[J]. Heart, 2020, 106(20):1595-1603.
[9]
郭浩,齐茗.高危急性冠脉综合征患者PCI术后不良心血管事件发生的影响因素[J].解放军预防医学杂志201937(11):59-60.
[10]
陈望姣.H型高血压与初发急性心肌梗死患者近期预后的关系[J].实用临床医药杂志201923(10):39-41.
[11]
熊国均,黄楷森,欧荣华,等.纤维蛋白原与白蛋白比值对多支血管病变性急性心肌梗死患者PCI术后远期预后的预测价值[J].疑难病杂志201918(12):1212-1217.
[12]
Song J, Yu T, Sun Z, et al. Comparison of prognostic significance between serum fibrinogen and Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events score for prognosis of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention[J]. Coron Artery Dis, 2020, 31(2):124-129.
[13]
赵一品,季莹莹,王丰云,等.纤维蛋白原与白蛋白比值预测急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者梗死相关动脉自发再通的价值[J].中华心血管病杂志201947(2):123-128.
[14]
Revnic C, Nica AS, Revnic F, et al. Relationship between matrix metalloproteinases mmp-9, mmp-7, their inhibitors, hs crp and severity of atherosclerotic coronary artery disease[J/OL]. J Hypertens, 2017, 35(2):e294.
[15]
Lekic A, Brekalo Z, Kvesic A, et al. Crosstalk between enzyme matrix metalloproteinases 2 and 9 and regulatory t cell immunity in the global burden of atherosclerosis[J]. Scand J Immunol, 2017, 86(1):65-71.
[16]
Deveci B, Gazi E. Relation between globulin, fibrinogen, and albumin with the presence and severity of coronary artery disease[J]. Angiology, 2020, 72(2):174-180.
[17]
Karabağ Y, Çağdaş M, Rencuzogullari I, et al. Relationship between C-reactive protein/albumin ratio and coronary artery disease severity in patients with stable angina pectoris[J/OL]. J Clin Lab Anal, 2018, 32(7):e22457.
[1] 陈晓玲, 钟永洌, 刘巧梨, 李娜, 张志奇, 廖威明, 黄桂武. 超高龄髋膝关节术后谵妄及心血管并发症风险预测[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 575-584.
[2] 陈翠萍, 李佩君, 杜景榕, 谢青梅, 许一宁, 卓姝妤, 李晓芳. 互联网联合上门护理在老年全髋关节置换术后的应用效果[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 676-681.
[3] 曾敬, 吴冬冬, 邵明, 范震波, 王治国, 刘培谊, 兰海峰. 高龄髋部骨折患者不同手术时机的围手术期疗效评估[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 445-449.
[4] 刘子洋, 崔俭俭, 赵茵. 产科弥散性血管内凝血及其评分系统的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 511-518.
[5] 李鑫钊, 张廷涛, 朱峰, 刘金山, 刘大闯. 血纤维蛋白原、D-二聚体及碱性磷酸酶诊断前列腺癌骨转移的价值分析[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 459-463.
[6] 宋俊锋, 张珍珍. 单侧初发性腹股沟斜疝老年患者经腹腹膜前疝修补术中残余疝囊腹直肌下缘固定效果评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 670-674.
[7] 张晋伟, 董永红, 王家璇. 基于GBD2021 数据库对中国与全球老年人疝疾病负担和健康不平等的分析比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 708-716.
[8] 袁志静, 黄杰, 何国安, 方辉强. 罗哌卡因联合右美托咪定局部阻滞麻醉在老年腹腔镜下无张力疝修补术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 557-561.
[9] 邵世锋, 肖钦, 沈方龙, 张迅, 郝志鹏, 伍正彬, 谢晓娟, 王耀丽. 老年胸主动脉钝性伤的重症救治分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 762-767.
[10] 伍细蓉, 徐立文, 陈亚琼. 基于LPR和FARI构建肝衰竭患者生存预后模型[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 675-681.
[11] 王贝贝, 崔振义, 王静, 王晗妍, 吕红芝, 李秀婷. 老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者术后贫血预测模型的构建与验证[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 355-362.
[12] 崔健, 夏青, 林云, 李光玲, 李心娜, 王位. 血小板与淋巴细胞比值、免疫球蛋白、心肌酶谱及心电图对中老年肝硬化患者病情及预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 400-406.
[13] 孙文恺, 沈青, 杭丽, 张迎春. 纤维蛋白原与清蛋白比值、中性粒细胞与白蛋白比值、C反应蛋白与溃疡性结肠炎病情评估和预后的关系[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 426-431.
[14] 郑屹, 刘莹, 张煜坤, 李广平, 陈康寅, 刘彤. 既往及新发心房颤动对急性心肌梗死患者远期卒中风险的影响[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 406-417.
[15] 周洪千, 张煜坤, 顾天舒, 胡苏涛, 姜超, 张雪, 张昊, 陶华岳, 刘行, 刘彤, 陈康寅. 既往出血性脑卒中患者行经皮冠脉介入治疗后不良事件的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 323-329.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?