切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华老年病研究电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (01) : 28 -33. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8757.2021.01.007

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

洛贝林在老年患者内镜手术静脉麻醉中的应用价值
胡泽凡1, 胡忠诚1, 马建1, 岳定雄1, 张凯1, 李琳1,()   
  1. 1. 432100 湖北省孝感市第一人民医院麻醉科
  • 收稿日期:2021-02-10 出版日期:2021-02-28
  • 通信作者: 李琳
  • 基金资助:
    孝感市自然科学基金计划项目(XKGJ2020010082)

Application value of lobeline in intravenous anesthesia of elderly patients undergoing endoscopic surgery

Zefan Hu1, Zhongcheng Hu1, Jian Ma1, Dingxiong Yue1, Kai Zhang1, Lin Li1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, The First People's Hospital of Xiaogan City, Xiaogan 432100, China
  • Received:2021-02-10 Published:2021-02-28
  • Corresponding author: Lin Li
引用本文:

胡泽凡, 胡忠诚, 马建, 岳定雄, 张凯, 李琳. 洛贝林在老年患者内镜手术静脉麻醉中的应用价值[J]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2021, 08(01): 28-33.

Zefan Hu, Zhongcheng Hu, Jian Ma, Dingxiong Yue, Kai Zhang, Lin Li. Application value of lobeline in intravenous anesthesia of elderly patients undergoing endoscopic surgery[J]. Chinese Journal of Geriatrics Research(Electronic Edition), 2021, 08(01): 28-33.

目的

观察洛贝林在老年患者内镜手术静脉麻醉中的应用价值。

方法

选取2020年2月至2021年2月在孝感市第一人民医院行内镜手术静脉麻醉的300例老年患者,其中150例(对照组)静脉麻醉用药为地佐辛0.05 mg/kg+丙泊酚1.5 mg/kg,余150例(观察组)静脉麻醉用药为地佐辛0.05 mg/kg+洛贝林3.0 mg+丙泊酚1.5 mg/kg。两组患者均将脑电双频指数(bispectral index, BIS)控制在50~60后进行手术操作并维持,术中根据手术进度间断单次追加丙泊酚0.5 mg/kg。观察两组患者麻醉用药开始后1 min(T1)、3 min(T2)、5 min(T3)、10 min(T4)、15 min(T5)各时点的平均动脉压(mean artery pressure, MAP)、心率、脉搏血氧饱和度(pulse oxygen saturation, SpO2)、呼气末二氧化碳分压(end tidal partial pressure of carbon dioxide, PetCO2)、BIS、呼吸暂停和低氧血症发生率,以及患者术后清醒时间、出恢复室时间、苏醒延迟发生率。两组间独立计量资料的比较采用t检验,连续性计量资料的比较采用重复测量方差分析,计数资料的比较采用χ2检验。

结果

两组患者麻醉用药后SpO2及PetCO2的差异有统计学意义(F=13.620、19.250,P<0.05),其中观察组T1、T2、T3、T4、T5各时点SpO2及PetCO2均明显高于对照组(P<0.05)。两组患者麻醉用药后MAP、心率及BIS的差异无统计学意义(F=3.521、1.521、1.927,P>0.05)。两组患者清醒时间、出恢复室时间、苏醒延迟发生率的差异均无统计学意义(t=0.181、0.082,χ2=0.000,P>0.05);观察组患者呼吸暂停及低氧血症发生率均明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(χ2=31.274、33.166,P<0.01)。

结论

对于老年内镜手术患者,静脉麻醉中预防性使用洛贝林能显著降低老年患者术中低氧血症的发生率,且不延长患者术后的苏醒和出室时间,安全性高。

Objective

To observe the application value of lobelin in the elderly patients with endoscopic surgery under intravenous anesthesia.

Methods

300 elderly patients who received intravenous anesthesia for endoscopic surgery in Xiaogan First People's Hospital from February 2020 to February 2021 were selected. Among them, 150 cases (control group) were given intravenous anesthesia with dezocine 0.05 mg/kg + propofol 1.5 mg/kg, and the other 150 cases (observation group) were given intravenous anesthesia with dezocine 0.05 mg/kg + lobeline 3.0 mg + propofol 1.5 mg/kg. The bispectral index (BIS) was controlled in 50-60 for operation and maintenance.. During the operation, 0.5 mg/kg of propofol was added intermittently single time according to the operation progress. The mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate, pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2), pulse oxygen saturation (PetCO2), BIS, apnea, hypoxemia, the incidence of postoperative awake time, recovery time and recovery delay rate were observed at 1 min (T1), 3 min (T2), 5 min (T3), 10 min (T4), and 15 min (T5) after starting anesthesia in two groups. T test was used to compare the independent measurement data between the two groups, repeated measurement analysis of variance was used to compare the continuous measurement data, and χ2 test was used to compare the counting data.

Results

There were significant differences in SpO2 and PetCO2 between the two groups after anesthesia (F=13.620, 19.250, P < 0.05), and the SpO2 and PetCO2 in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group at T1, T2, T3, T4 and T5 (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in MAP, heart rate and BIS between the two groups (F=3.521, 1.521, P < 0.05). There were no significant difference in awake time, time out of recovery room and incidence of delayed recovery between the two groups (t=0.181, 0.082, χ2=0.000, P > 0.05), the incidence of apnea and hypoxemia in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (χ2=31.274, 33.166, P > 0.05).

Conclusion

For elderly patients with endoscopic surgery, the prophylactic use of lobeline in intravenous anesthesia is safe and effective, which can significantly reduce the incidence of hypoxemia in elderly patients, and does not prolong the postoperative recovery and out of room time.

表1 两组患者一般情况的比较
表2 两组患者麻醉用药后T1、T2、T3、T4、T5各时点的PetCO2及SpO2±s
表3 两组患者T1、T2、T3、T4、T5各时点MAP、心率及BIS的比较(±s
表4 两组患者清醒时间、出恢复室时间、呼吸暂停及低氧血症发生率、苏醒延迟发生率的比较
[1]
子扬.内镜技术呼唤规范[J].中国卫生人才,2013,15(10):42-46.
[2]
国家消化内镜质控中心,国家麻醉质控中心.中国消化内镜诊疗镇静/麻醉操作技术规范[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2019,35(1):81-84.
[3]
马正良,黄宇光,顾小萍,等.成人日间手术加速康复外科麻醉管理专家共识[J].协和医学杂志,2019,10(6):562-569.
[4]
Iannuzzi E, Lannuzzi M, Cirillo V, et al. Periintubation cardiovascular response during low dose remifentanil or sufentanil administration in association with propofol TCI: A double blind comparison[J]. Minerva Anestesiol, 2004, 70(3):109-115.
[5]
田鑫,陈霞,单爱莲,等.丙泊酚脂肪乳注射液生物等效性研究实施和管理的专家共识[J].中国临床药理学杂志,2021,37(2):204-208.
[6]
古筝,胡笛,凌硕,等.不同剂量羟考酮复合丙泊酚在无痛胃镜检查中的应用效果比较[J].中华保健医学杂志,2021,23(1):43-46.
[7]
Qadeer MA, Lopez AR, Dumot JA, et al. Hypoxemia during moderate sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy: Causes and associations[J]. Digestion, 2011, 84(1):37-45.
[8]
Dumonceau JM, Riphaus A, Schreiber F, et al. Nonanesthesiologist administration of propofol for gastrointestinal endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, European Society of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Nurses and Associates Guideline--Updated June 2015[J]. Endoscopy, 2015, 47(12):1175-1189.
[9]
Xiao Q, Yang Y, Zhou Y, et al. Comparison of nasopharyngeal airway device and nasal oxygen tube in obese patients undergoing intravenous anesthesia for gastroscopy: A prospective and randomized study[J]. Gastroenterol Res Pract, 2016, 2016:2641257.
[10]
Patterson KW, Noonan N, Keeling NW, et al. Hypoxemia during outpatient gastrointestinal endoscopy: The effects of sedation and supplemental oxygen[J]. J Clin Anesth, 1995, 7(2):136-140.
[11]
万翊娟,肖彬,钟和英,等.地佐辛联合丙泊酚在结肠镜检查中的应用价值[J].当代医学,2021,27(2):149-150.
[12]
杨海军.比较地佐辛与芬太尼复合应用丙泊酚在无痛人工流产麻醉中的应用效果[J].中西医结合心血管病电子杂志,2020,8(13):21-22.
[13]
杨薇,张敏,栾秀姝,等.不同麻醉方案在无痛胃肠镜诊疗中的麻醉效果分析[J].北京医学,2020,42(7):620-623.
[14]
李秋萍,韩斌如.衰弱评估联合麻醉分级对老年患者术后并发症的预测研究[J].中华护理杂志,2019,54(5):645-648.
[15]
Mason KP, Green SM, Piacevoli Q, et al. Adverse event reporting tool to standardize the reporting and tracking of adverse events during procedural sedation: A consensus document from the World SIVA International Sedation Task Force[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2012, 108(1):13-20.
[16]
姜春萌.消化内镜技术的发展与应用[J].大连医科大学学报,2020,42(3):193-197.
[17]
朱红梅.PBL联合情景模拟教学法在日间手术中心病房规培护士带教中的应用效果评价[J].智慧健康,2019,5(8):34-35.
[18]
鲁雅飞,魏萍.全程舒适护理对消化内镜微创治疗患者的护理效果观察[J].中国卫生标准管理,2020,11(24):145-147.
[19]
Cassinotti E, Colombo EM, Di Giuseppe M, et al. Current indications for laparoscopy in day-case surgery[J]. Int J Surg, 2008, 6 Suppl 1:S93-S96.
[20]
兰云丽,魏义勇,王海英.小剂量咪达唑仑对老年行无痛胃镜诊疗患者麻醉效果及术后认知功能的影响[J].中国老年学杂志,2020,40(24):5217-5221.
[21]
刘丽,吴津惠.地佐辛复合丙泊酚用于肩关节脱位手法复位术的临床观察[J].继续医学教育,2019,33(10):128-130.
[22]
邢朝富.地佐辛复合丙泊酚静脉麻醉在老年人无痛胃镜检查中的应用[J].中国实用医药,2020,15(26):144-146.
[23]
李頔,冉娅娟,刘蕊,等.本院2016-2018年第二类精神药品使用现状分析[J].西南医科大学学报,2020,43(6):596-600.
[24]
胡凯,李亚峰,田烨.地佐辛复合咪达唑仑在老年患者麻醉拔管期的应用[J].江西医药,2017,52(7):692-693.
[25]
罗婵,王雅麒,季静,等.脑电双频指数在临床上的应用进展[J].中国实验诊断学,2020,24(1):153-156.
[26]
Haesen J, Eertmans W, Genbrugge C, et al. The validation of simplified EEG derived from the bispectral index monitor in post-cardiac arrest patients[J]. Resuscitation, 2018, 126:179.
[27]
Ozcan MS, Gronlund SD, Trojan R, et al. Does a BIS-guided maintenance of anesthetic depth prevent implicit memory[J]? Psychology, 2011, 2(3):143-149.
[28]
陈广民,郭雷,李恩有.丙泊酚靶控输注准确性的研究进展[J].中国现代应用药学,2020,37(19):2428-2432.
[29]
Amornyotin S. Sedation-related complications in gastrointestinal endoscopy[J]. World J Gastrointest Endosc, 2013, 5(11):527-533.
[30]
Janda M, Simanski O, Bajorat J, et al. Clinical evaluation of a simultaneous closed-loopanaesthesia control system for depth of anaesthesia and neuromuscular blockade[J]. Anaesthesia, 2011, 66(12):1112-1120.
[31]
林雨轩,赵延华,王筱婧.丙泊酚镇静下无痛胃镜术中低氧血症的发生率及危险因素分析[J].诊断学理论与实践,2020,19(6):594-599.
[32]
姚晶曼,李元海.依托咪酯联合丙泊酚用于老年患者无痛气管镜诊疗的临床观察[J].中国药房,2020,31(24):3031-3035.
[33]
Riphaus A, Wehmann T, Weber B, et al. S3 guideline: Sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy 2008[J]. Endoscopy, 2009, 41(9):787-815.
[34]
张霞,密夫丽,孙传玉,等.旁流式呼气末二氧化碳分压监测在消化内镜麻醉中的应用[J].中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版),2020,10(6):244-247.
[35]
张珂,鞠风玲.小剂量注射用甲泼尼龙琥珀酸钠联合尼可刹米对COPD合并呼吸衰竭患者肺功能及动脉血气指标的影响[J].河南医学研究,2020,29(6):1063-1064.
[1] 许振琦, 易伟, 范闻轩, 王金锋. 经鼻高流量氧疗与无创机械通气在严重创伤术后轻中度低氧血症患者中的临床应用[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 306-309.
[2] 中国老年医学学会烧创伤分会. 老年患者皮肤撕裂伤防护专家共识(2022版)[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(02): 98-103.
[3] 庞兴华, 苑著. 针吸细胞块技术在术前乳腺癌分子分型中的应用研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 276-279.
[4] 李大伟, 吴宏飞, 韩鹏, 孙盼盼, 邢红伟. 静脉-吸入复合麻醉与全静脉麻醉在老年腹腔镜疝修补术中应用效果比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 458-462.
[5] 张芝, 孙海云. 舒适护理对老年腹股沟疝患者腹腔镜手术后睡眠质量及满意度的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 488-490.
[6] 邵乐宁, 何腾飞, 钟丰云, 吴浩荣. 嵌顿疝合并新型冠状病毒感染高龄患者的外科诊治体会[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 280-284.
[7] 李云锋, 俞永江. 抗凝治疗的老年腹股沟疝患者围手术期治疗研究进展[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 247-250.
[8] 董艳, 吴向阳, 林巧兰, 李国栋, 杨瑞洲. 基于快速康复外科理念的清单管理在老年双侧腹股沟疝患者围手术期的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 354-358.
[9] 邓美云, 马兰, 胡惠惠. 双环节协同护理模式在老年腹股沟疝患者中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 346-349.
[10] 陈趟, 王艺萱, 吴刚. 单肺通气术中低氧血症与术后肺部并发症的关系及其预测意义[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(03): 355-357.
[11] 侯文运, 刘恒昌, 窦利州, 陈海鹏, 郑朝旭, 王贵齐, 王锡山. 腹部无辅助切口内镜引导下取标本的腹腔镜辅助右半结肠癌根治术(保留回盲部)(附视频)[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 436-440.
[12] 刘政委, 仪立志, 尹夕龙, 孔文龙, 纠智松, 张文源. 锥颅血肿外引流与神经内镜手术治疗老年基底节区高血压性脑出血的疗效分析[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 299-303.
[13] 李永胜, 孙家和, 郭书伟, 卢义康, 刘洪洲. 高龄结直肠癌患者根治术后短期并发症及其影响因素[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 962-967.
[14] 卓徐鹏, 刘颖, 任菁菁. 感染性疾病与老年人低蛋白血症的相关性研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 896-899.
[15] 梁宇峰, 王超, 黄献锋, 朱琳玲, 杨芳琼. 内镜面罩与喉罩无创辅助通气在无痛支气管镜诊疗中的应用效果比较[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(07): 652-656.
阅读次数
全文


摘要