切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华老年病研究电子杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (03) : 26 -28. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8757.2020.03.006

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

泛影葡胺注射治疗老年乳腺癌改良根治术后腋窝积液疗效分析
马维昌1,(), 张淑鹏1   
  1. 1. 264100 滨州医学院烟台附属医院甲状腺乳腺外科
  • 收稿日期:2019-11-05 出版日期:2020-08-28
  • 通信作者: 马维昌

Efficacy of meglumine diatrizoate injection in the treatment of elderly patients with axillary effusion after modified radical mastectomy

Weichang Ma1,(), Shupeng Zhang1   

  1. 1. Department of Breast And Thyroid Surgery, Yantai Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical University, Yantai 264100, China
  • Received:2019-11-05 Published:2020-08-28
  • Corresponding author: Weichang Ma
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Ma Weichang, Email:
引用本文:

马维昌, 张淑鹏. 泛影葡胺注射治疗老年乳腺癌改良根治术后腋窝积液疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2020, 07(03): 26-28.

Weichang Ma, Shupeng Zhang. Efficacy of meglumine diatrizoate injection in the treatment of elderly patients with axillary effusion after modified radical mastectomy[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Geriatrics Research(Electronic Edition), 2020, 07(03): 26-28.

目的

探讨泛影葡胺局部注射联合上肢弹力绷带包扎法治疗老年乳腺癌改良根治术后腋窝积液的效果。

方法

选取2017年1月至2019年6月滨州医学院烟台附属医院收治的老年乳腺癌改良根治术后腋窝积液患者68例,其中34例(观察组)行泛影葡胺局部注射联合上肢弹力绷带包扎法+负压引流并局部加压包扎治疗,34例(对照组)行单纯负压引流并局部加压包扎治疗。比较两组患者腋窝引流量、腋窝引流管留置时间及不良反应的发生情况。组间比较采用t检验。

结果

观察组腋窝引流量明显低于对照组,腋窝引流管留置时间明显少于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(t=1.489、5.831,P<0.05或0.01)。两组患者均无全身不良反应发生。

结论

泛影葡胺局部注射联合上肢弹力绷带包扎法可明显减少腋窝引流量、显著缩短腋窝引流管留置时间,简便易行、安全性高。

Objective

To investigate the effect of meglumine diatrizoate local injection combined with upper limb elastic bandage in the treatment of elderly patients with axillary effusion after modified radical mastectomy.

Methods

68 elderly patients with axillary effusion after modified radical resection of breast cancer admitted to the Yantai Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical College from January 2017 to June 2019 were selected. Among them, 34 patients (observation group) received local injection of methylene blue combined with upper limb elastic bandage + negative pressure drainage and local pressure dressing, while 34 patients (control group) received simple negative pressure drainage and local pressure dressing. The axillary drainage volume, indwelling time of axillary drainage tube and the occurrence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. T test was used for comparison between groups.

Results

The axillary drainage volume of the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group, and the indwelling time of the axillary drainage tube was significantly lower than that of the control group (t=1.489, 5.831; P < 0.05 or 0.01). No systemic adverse reactions occurred in both groups.

Conclusion

Local injection of meglumine diatrizoate combined with upper limb elastic bandage bandage can significantly reduce axillary drainage volume and significantly shorten the indwelling time of axillary drainage tube, which is easy to operate and has high safety.

表1 两组患者腋窝引流量及置管时间的比较(±s
[1]
van Bemmel AJM, van de Velde CJH, Schmitz RF, et al. Prevention of seroma formation after axillary dissection in breast cancer: a systematic review[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2011, 37(10):829-835.
[2]
Docimo G, Limongelli P, Conzo G, et al. Axillary lymphadenectomy for breast cancer in elderly patients and fibrin glue[J]. BMC Surg, 2013, 13(Suppl 2):S8.
[3]
Dalberg K, Johansson H, Signomklao T, et al. A randomized study of axillary drainage and pectoral fascia preservation after mastectomy for breast cancer[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2004, 30(6):602-609.
[4]
中华医学会外科学分会乳腺外科学组.乳腺癌改良根治术专家共识及手术操作指南(2018版)[J].中国实用外科杂志,2018,38(8):851-854.
[5]
Selvendran S, Cheluvappa R, Tr Ng VK, et al. Efficacy of harmonic focus scalpel in seroma prevention after axillary clearance[J]. Int J Surg, 2016, 30:116-120.
[6]
Faisal M, Fathy H, Shaban H, et al. A novel technique of harmonic tissue dissection reduces seroma formation after modified radical mastectomy compared to conventional lectrocautery: a single-blind randomized controlled trial[J]. Patient Safety Surg, 2018,12(1):8.
[7]
Faisal M, Abuelela ST, Mostafa W, et al. Efficacy of axillary exclusion on seroma formation after modified radical mastectomy[J]. World J Surg Oncol,2016,14(1):39.
[8]
常涛,李喆,石林祥,等.乳腺癌改良根治术后腋窝积液防治对策的探讨[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志,2012,19(13):1007-1011.
[9]
张彦武,李庆辉,严文君,等.明胶海绵在预防乳腺癌术后腋窝淋巴瘘中的应用[J].中国普通外科杂志,2015,24(5):763-765.
[1] 李洋, 蔡金玉, 党晓智, 常婉英, 巨艳, 高毅, 宋宏萍. 基于深度学习的乳腺超声应变弹性图像生成模型的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 563-570.
[2] 周荷妹, 金杰, 叶建东, 夏之一, 王进进, 丁宁. 罕见成人肋骨郎格汉斯细胞组织细胞增生症被误诊为乳腺癌术后骨转移一例[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 380-383.
[3] 河北省抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会护理协作组. 乳腺癌中心静脉通路护理管理专家共识[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 321-329.
[4] 刘晨鹭, 刘洁, 张帆, 严彩英, 陈倩, 陈双庆. 增强MRI 影像组学特征生境分析在预测乳腺癌HER-2 表达状态中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 339-345.
[5] 张晓宇, 殷雨来, 张银旭. 阿帕替尼联合新辅助化疗对三阴性乳腺癌的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 346-352.
[6] 邱琳, 刘锦辉, 组木热提·吐尔洪, 马悦心, 冷晓玲. 超声影像组学对致密型乳腺背景中非肿块型乳腺癌的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 353-360.
[7] 程燕妮, 樊菁, 肖瑶, 舒瑞, 明昊, 党晓智, 宋宏萍. 乳腺组织定位标记夹的应用与进展[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 361-365.
[8] 涂盛楠, 胡芬, 张娟, 蔡海峰, 杨俊泉. 天然植物提取物在乳腺癌治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 366-370.
[9] 朱文婷, 顾鹏, 孙星. 非酒精性脂肪性肝病对乳腺癌发生发展及治疗的影响[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 371-375.
[10] 葛睿, 陈飞, 李杰, 李娟娟, 陈涵. 多基因检测在早期乳腺癌辅助治疗中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 257-263.
[11] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[12] 韩萌萌, 冯雪园, 马宁. 乳腺癌改良根治术后桡神经损伤1例[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 117-118.
[13] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[14] 王玲艳, 高春晖, 冯雪园, 崔鑫淼, 刘欢, 赵文明, 张金库. 循环肿瘤细胞在乳腺癌新辅助及术后辅助治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 630-633.
[15] 赵林娟, 吕婕, 王文胜, 马德茂, 侯涛. 超声引导下染色剂标记切缘的梭柱型和圆柱型保乳区段切除术的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-637.
阅读次数
全文


摘要