切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华老年病研究电子杂志

中华老年病研究电子杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (03) : 26 -28. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8757.2020.03.006

所属专题： 文献；

临床研究

泛影葡胺注射治疗老年乳腺癌改良根治术后腋窝积液疗效分析
马维昌1,†(), 张淑鹏1   
  1. 1. 264100　滨州医学院烟台附属医院甲状腺乳腺外科
  • 收稿日期:2019-11-05 出版日期:2020-08-28
  • 通信作者: 马维昌

Efficacy of meglumine diatrizoate injection in the treatment of elderly patients with axillary effusion after modified radical mastectomy

Weichang Ma1,†(), Shupeng Zhang1   

  1. 1. Department of Breast And Thyroid Surgery, Yantai Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical University, Yantai 264100, China
  • Received:2019-11-05 Published:2020-08-28
  • Corresponding author: Weichang Ma
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Ma Weichang, Email:
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

马维昌, 张淑鹏. 泛影葡胺注射治疗老年乳腺癌改良根治术后腋窝积液疗效分析[J]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2020, 07(03): 26-28.

Weichang Ma, Shupeng Zhang. Efficacy of meglumine diatrizoate injection in the treatment of elderly patients with axillary effusion after modified radical mastectomy[J]. Chinese Journal of Geriatrics Research(Electronic Edition), 2020, 07(03): 26-28.

目的

探讨泛影葡胺局部注射联合上肢弹力绷带包扎法治疗老年乳腺癌改良根治术后腋窝积液的效果。

方法

选取2017年1月至2019年6月滨州医学院烟台附属医院收治的老年乳腺癌改良根治术后腋窝积液患者68例，其中34例（观察组）行泛影葡胺局部注射联合上肢弹力绷带包扎法+负压引流并局部加压包扎治疗，34例（对照组）行单纯负压引流并局部加压包扎治疗。比较两组患者腋窝引流量、腋窝引流管留置时间及不良反应的发生情况。组间比较采用t检验。

结果

观察组腋窝引流量明显低于对照组，腋窝引流管留置时间明显少于对照组，差异均有统计学意义（t=1.489、5.831，P<0.05或0.01）。两组患者均无全身不良反应发生。

结论

泛影葡胺局部注射联合上肢弹力绷带包扎法可明显减少腋窝引流量、显著缩短腋窝引流管留置时间，简便易行、安全性高。

关键词: 乳腺肿瘤, 改良根治术, 腋窝积液, 泛影葡胺, 弹力绷带
Objective

To investigate the effect of meglumine diatrizoate local injection combined with upper limb elastic bandage in the treatment of elderly patients with axillary effusion after modified radical mastectomy.

Methods

68 elderly patients with axillary effusion after modified radical resection of breast cancer admitted to the Yantai Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical College from January 2017 to June 2019 were selected. Among them, 34 patients (observation group) received local injection of methylene blue combined with upper limb elastic bandage + negative pressure drainage and local pressure dressing, while 34 patients (control group) received simple negative pressure drainage and local pressure dressing. The axillary drainage volume, indwelling time of axillary drainage tube and the occurrence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. T test was used for comparison between groups.

Results

The axillary drainage volume of the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group, and the indwelling time of the axillary drainage tube was significantly lower than that of the control group (t=1.489, 5.831; P < 0.05 or 0.01). No systemic adverse reactions occurred in both groups.

Conclusion

Local injection of meglumine diatrizoate combined with upper limb elastic bandage bandage can significantly reduce axillary drainage volume and significantly shorten the indwelling time of axillary drainage tube, which is easy to operate and has high safety.

Key words: Breast tumor, Modified radical mastectomy, Axillary seroma formation, Diatrizoate, Elastic bandage
表1 两组患者腋窝引流量及置管时间的比较（±s）
组别 例数 腋窝引流量（ml） 引流管留置时间（d）
观察组 34 42.7±10.3 9.2±1.0
对照组 34 61.9±12.8 13.1±1.6
t值   1.489 5.831
P值   <0.01 <0.05
[1]
van Bemmel AJM, van de Velde CJH, Schmitz RF, et al. Prevention of seroma formation after axillary dissection in breast cancer: a systematic review[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2011, 37(10):829-835.
[2]
Docimo G, Limongelli P, Conzo G, et al. Axillary lymphadenectomy for breast cancer in elderly patients and fibrin glue[J]. BMC Surg, 2013, 13(Suppl 2):S8.
[3]
Dalberg K, Johansson H, Signomklao T, et al. A randomized study of axillary drainage and pectoral fascia preservation after mastectomy for breast cancer[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2004, 30(6):602-609.
[4]
中华医学会外科学分会乳腺外科学组.乳腺癌改良根治术专家共识及手术操作指南（2018版）[J].中国实用外科杂志，2018，38（8）：851-854.
[5]
Selvendran S, Cheluvappa R, Tr Ng VK, et al. Efficacy of harmonic focus scalpel in seroma prevention after axillary clearance[J]. Int J Surg, 2016, 30:116-120.
[6]
Faisal M, Fathy H, Shaban H, et al. A novel technique of harmonic tissue dissection reduces seroma formation after modified radical mastectomy compared to conventional lectrocautery: a single-blind randomized controlled trial[J]. Patient Safety Surg, 2018,12(1):8.
[7]
Faisal M, Abuelela ST, Mostafa W, et al. Efficacy of axillary exclusion on seroma formation after modified radical mastectomy[J]. World J Surg Oncol，2016，14(1):39.
[8]
常涛，李喆，石林祥，等.乳腺癌改良根治术后腋窝积液防治对策的探讨[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志，2012，19（13）：1007-1011.
[9]
张彦武，李庆辉，严文君，等.明胶海绵在预防乳腺癌术后腋窝淋巴瘘中的应用[J].中国普通外科杂志，2015，24（5）：763-765.
[1] 郏亚平, 曾书娥. 含鳞状细胞癌成分的乳腺化生性癌的超声与病理特征分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2023, 20(08): 844-848.
[2] 唐玮, 何融泉, 黄素宁. 深度学习在乳腺癌影像诊疗和预后预测中的应用[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 323-328.
[3] 康夏, 田浩, 钱进, 高源, 缪洪明, 齐晓伟. 骨织素抑制破骨细胞分化改善肿瘤骨转移中骨溶解的机制研究[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 329-339.
[4] 衣晓丽, 胡沙沙, 张彦. HER-2低表达对乳腺癌新辅助治疗疗效及预后的影响[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 340-346.
[5] 施杰, 李云涛, 高海燕. 腋窝淋巴结阳性Luminal A型乳腺癌患者新辅助与辅助化疗的预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 353-361.
[6] 伍秋苑, 陈佩贤, 邓裕华, 何添成, 周丹. 肠道微生物在乳腺癌中的研究进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 362-365.
[7] 谭巧, 苏小涵, 侯令密, 黎君彦, 邓世山. 乳腺髓样癌的诊治进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 366-368.
[8] 周婉丽, 钱铮, 李喆. 槐耳在乳腺癌免疫治疗中的研究进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 369-371.
[9] 熊倩, 罗凤. 乳腺癌患者术后康复现状与对策的研究进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 372-374.
[10] 杨小菁, 姜瑞瑞, 石玉香, 王静静, 李长天. 乳腺孤立性纤维性肿瘤一例[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 375-377.
[11] 冯雪园, 韩萌萌, 马宁. 乳腺原发上皮样血管内皮瘤一例[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 378-380.
[12] 康一坤, 袁芃. 三阴性乳腺癌分子遗传学及临床特征研究进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 290-293.
[13] 晏晴艳, 雍晓梅, 罗洪, 杜敏. 成都地区老年转移性乳腺癌的预后及生存因素研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 636-638.
[14] 李智铭, 郭晨明, 庄晓晨, 候雪琴, 高军喜. 早期乳腺癌超声造影定性及定量指标的对比研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 639-643.
[15] 莫波, 王佩, 王恒, 何志军, 梁俊, 郝志楠. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术与改良胃癌根治术治疗早期胃癌的疗效[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 644-647.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号