切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华老年病研究电子杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (02) : 12 -16. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8757.2020.02.004

所属专题: 专题评论 文献

论著

血清生长分化因子-15、可溶性人基质裂解素2、半乳糖凝集素-3检测在老年心力衰竭严重程度和预后评估中的应用
吴桂颖1, 胡立群1,(), 李红旗1   
  1. 1. 230001 合肥,中国科学技术大学附属第一医院老年心内科
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-09 出版日期:2020-05-28
  • 通信作者: 胡立群
  • 基金资助:
    安徽省心血管病研究所科研项目(KF2018002)

Application of detection of serum growth differentiation factor-15, soluble human stromalysin 2 and galectin-3 on the severity and prognosis evaluation in elderly patients with heart failure

Guiying Wu1, Liqun Hu1,(), Hongqi Li1   

  1. 1. Geriatric Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Hefei 230001, China
  • Received:2019-12-09 Published:2020-05-28
  • Corresponding author: Liqun Hu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Hu Liqun, Email:
引用本文:

吴桂颖, 胡立群, 李红旗. 血清生长分化因子-15、可溶性人基质裂解素2、半乳糖凝集素-3检测在老年心力衰竭严重程度和预后评估中的应用[J]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2020, 07(02): 12-16.

Guiying Wu, Liqun Hu, Hongqi Li. Application of detection of serum growth differentiation factor-15, soluble human stromalysin 2 and galectin-3 on the severity and prognosis evaluation in elderly patients with heart failure[J]. Chinese Journal of Geriatrics Research(Electronic Edition), 2020, 07(02): 12-16.

目的

探讨血清生长分化因子-15(growth differentiation factor-15, GDF-15)、可溶性人基质裂解素2(soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2, sST2)及半乳糖凝集素-3(galectin-3, Gal-3)水平对老年心力衰竭患者病情严重程度与预后的评估价值。

方法

选取中国科学技术大学附属第一医院2018年1~8月收治的老年心力衰竭患者74例,根据随访1年后的不良事件结局(心血管死亡或因心力衰竭再住院)分为事件组和无事件组,先行两组患者的单因素比较(计量资料采用t检验或秩和检验,计数资料比较采用χ2检验),再将有意义的指标纳入多因素COX回归分析,并采用ROC曲线评价GDF-15、sST2和Gal-3的检测价值。

结果

随访期间发生不良事件者28例(事件组),未发生不良事件46例(无事件组)。单因素分析显示,事件组患者血清GDF-15、Gal-3、sST2水平均显著高于无事件组(t=4.880、3.325,z=-4.213;P<0.05)。GDF-15、sST2、Gal-3水平与N末端B型利钠肽前体水平和NYHA心功能分级均呈正相关(r=0.647、0.706、0.471,0.668、0.603、0.446;P<0.05),GDF-15、sST2水平与左心室舒张末期内径呈正相关(r=0.322、0.289,P<0.05或0.01)、与左心室射血分数呈负相关(r=-0.262、-0.481,P<0.05)。COX回归分析显示,sST2是老年心力衰竭患者1年内不良事件的独立危险因素(OR=1.032,95%CI=1.009-1.054,P<0.01)。ROC曲线结果显示,血清GDF-15、sST2和Gal-3联合检测的曲线下面积最高,为0.851(95%CI=0.763-0.937)。

结论

血清GDF-15、sST2和Gal-3水平可以反映老年心力衰竭患者的病情严重程度,具有一定的预后价值,三者联合检测的效果最优。

Objective

To investigate the levels of serum growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15), soluble human stromalysin 2 (sST2) and galectin-3 (Gal-3) in evaluating the severity and prognosis of elderly patients with heart failure.

Methods

74 elderly patients with heart failure who were hospitalized in the First Affiliated Hospital of USTC from January 2018 to August 2018 were selected. According to the outcome of adverse events (cardiovascular death or rehospitalization due to heart failure) after 1 year of follow-up, they were divided into the event group and the event-free group. Univariate comparison was used between the two groups (the measurement data were tested by t test or rank sum test, while the count data were tested by chi-square test). Then, meaningful indicators were included in multivariate COX regression analysis. The characteristic curve (ROC) evaluates the prognostic value of combined detection of GDF-15, sST2, and Gal-3 in elderly patients with heart failure.

Results

During the follow-up period, 28 adverse events occurred (event group), no adverse events occurred in 46 cases(non-event group). GDF-15, sST2, and Gal-3 were significantly higher in the event group than in the non-event group (t=4.880, 3.325, z=-4.213, P < 0.05). Correlation analysis showed that GDF-15, sST2, Gal-3 were positively correlated with N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide and NYHA cardiac function grades (r=0.647, 0.706, 0.471, 0.668, 0.603, 0.446, P < 0.05), GDF-15 and sST2 were positively correlated with left ventricular end-diastolic inner diameter (r=0.322, 0.289, P < 0.05), and negatively correlated with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (r=-0.262, -0.481, P < 0.05). Multivariate COX regression analysis showed that sST2 was the risk factor for adverse events in elderly patients with heart failure within one year (OR=1.032, 95%CI=1.009-1.054, P < 0.05). ROC curve results showed that the area under the curve of serum GDF-15, sST2 and Gal-3 combined detection was the highest, which was 0.851 (95%CI=0.763-0.937).

Conclusion

Serum GDF-15, sST2 and Gal-3 levels can reflect the severity of the disease in elderly patients with heart failure, and have certain prognostic value.

表1 两组患者一般资料的比较
指标 事件组(28例) 无事件组(46例) 检验值 P
年龄(岁) 72.9±7.8 71.5±6.6 t=0.855 >0.05
男性[例(%)] 15(53.6) 25(54.3) χ2=0.004 >0.05
收缩压(mmHg) 119.4±13.2 127.8±15.6 t=1.993 <0.05
舒张压(mmHg) 77.5±10.8 80.1±12.8 t=0.907 >0.05
心率(次/min) 72.5±6.1 75.1±7.9 t=0.897 >0.05
BMI(kg/m2 23.2±2.9 22.6±3.4 t=0.751 >0.05
NYHA心功能分级[例(%)] ? ? ? ?
? Ⅱ级 4(14.3) 26(56.5) χ2=11.188 <0.01
? Ⅲ级 13(46.4) 17(37.0) χ2=4.150 <0.05
? Ⅳ级 11(39.3) 3(6.5) χ2=10.138 <0.01
既往合并症[例(%)] ? ? ? ?
? 心肌梗死 9(32.1) 11(23.9) χ2=0.598 >0.05
? 高血压 12(42.9) 21(45.7) χ2=0.055 >0.05
? 心房颤动 8(28.6) 12(26.1) χ2=0.054 >0.05
? 脑卒中 7(25.0) 11(23.9) χ2=0.080 >0.05
? 糖尿病 12(42.9) 14(30.4) χ2=1.179 >0.05
血钠(mmol/L) 135.3±6.4 137.5±4.1 t=0.986 >0.05
eGFR(ml·min-1·1.73-1 79.7±25.7 95.3±23.8 t=-2.647 <0.05
空腹血糖(mmol/L) 5.09±0.76 5.12±0.87 t=0.526 >0.05
血红蛋白(g/L) 129.7±11.4 132.3±12.8 t=0.526 >0.05
LDL-C(mmol/L) 2.2±1.1 2.4±1.0 t=-0.878 >0.05
NT-proBNP(pg/ml) 6096.5(3812.5,12975.0) 2179.0(996.5,3910.0) z=-4.999 <0.01
GDF-15(pg/ml) 546.4±249.5 311.0±165.7 t=4.880 <0.01
sST2(ng/ml) 22.3(14.1,34.0) 12.6(9.4,16.0) z=-4.213 <0.01
Gal-3(ng/ml) 25.0±15.6 14.7±6.0 t=3.325 <0.01
LVEF(%) 50.3±11.8 56.4±10.9 χ2=-2.278 <0.05
LVEDD(mm) 58.2±8.6 52.8±6.6 t=3.041 <0.01
6 min步行试验(m) 221.7±141.7 399.4±173.3 t=-4.569 <0.01
表2 74例心力衰竭患者GDF-15、sST2、Gal-3与心功能指标的相关性
表3 心力衰竭预后不良的危险因素分析
图1 GDF-15、sST2、Gal-3检测的ROC曲线分析
[1]
Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA focused update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on clinical practice guidelines and the heart failure society of America[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2017, 70(6):776-803.
[2]
Mair J, Gerda F, Renate H, et al. Hea-dto-head comparison of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and NTproBNP in daily clinical practice[J]. Int J Cardiol, 2008, 124(2):244-246.
[3]
Olechnicki M, Kasprzak K, Goch A. Growth differentiation factor 15--a new marker in heart diseases[J]. Pol Merkur Lekarski, 2010, 28(168):470-472.
[4]
Dalal JJ, Digrajkar A, Das B, et al. ST2 elevation in heart failure, predictive of a high early mortality[J]. Indian Heart J, 2018, 70(6):822-827.
[5]
Henderson NC, Sethi T. The regulation of inflammation by galectin-3[J]. Immunol Rev, 2009, 230(1):160-171.
[6]
中华医学会心血管病学分会心力衰竭学组,中国医师协会心力衰竭专业委员会中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会.中国心力衰竭诊断和治疗指南2018[J].中华心力衰竭和心肌病杂志,2018,2(4):196-225.
[7]
Di Lenarda A, Scherillo M, Maggioni AP, et al. Current presentation and management of heart failure in cardiology and internal medicine hospital units: a tale of words. The temistocle study[J]. Am Heart J, 2003, 146(4):E12.
[8]
Lutgens E, Gorelik L, Daemen MJ, et al. Requirement for CD154 in the progression of atherosclerosis[J]. Nat Med, 1999, 5(11):1313-1316.
[9]
Sharma A, Stevens SR, Lucas J, et al. Utility of growth differentiation factor-15, a marker of oxidative stress and inflammation, in chronic heart failure[J]. JACC, Heart Fail, 2017, 5(10):724-734.
[10]
Chan MM, Santhanakrishnan R, Chong JP, et al. Growth differentiation factor 15 in heart failure with preserved vs reduced ejection fraction[J]. Eur J Heart Fail, 2016, 18(1):81-88.
[11]
Sanada S, Hakuno D, Higgins LJ, et al. IL-33 and ST2 comprise a critical biomechanically induced and cardioprotective signaling system[J]. J Clin Invest, 2007, 117(6):1538-1549.
[12]
Aimo A, Vergaro G, Passino C, et al. Prognostic value of soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 in chronic heart failure: a meta-analysis[J]. JACC Heart Fail, 2017, 5(4):280-286.
[13]
Felker GM, Fiuzat M, Shaw LK, et al. Galectin-3 in ambulatory patients with heart failure clinical perspective: Results from the HF-ACTION study[J]. Circ Heart Fail, 2015, 5(1):72-78.
[14]
Zhang T, Shao B, Liu GA. Research on clinical value of galectin-3 in evaluating the prognosis of acute heart failure[J]. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 2017, 21(19):4406-4410.
[15]
Ho JE, Liu C, Lyass A, et al. Galectin-3, a marker of cardiac fibrosis, predicts incident heart failure in the community[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2012, 60(14):1249-1256.
[16]
Ky B, French B, Levy WC, et al. Multiple biomarkers for risk prediction in chronic heart failure[J]. Circ Heart Fail, 2012, 5(2):183-190.
[17]
李祥东,袁婷,王俊,等.联合检测血清半乳糖凝集素-3、可溶性生长刺激表达基因2蛋白在慢性心力衰竭患者中的应用价值[J].临床心血管病杂志,2018,34(9):914-917.
[18]
Grande D, Leone M, Rizzo C, et al. A multiparametric approach based on NT-proBNP, ST2, and Galectin3 for stratifying one year prognosis of chronic heart failure outpatients[J]. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis, 2017, 4(3):9.
[19]
Hage C, Michaëlsson E, Linde C, et al. Inflammatory biomarkers predict heart failure severity and prognosis in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: A holistic proteomic approach[J]. Circ Cardiovasc Genet, 2017, 10(1):e00163.
[1] 屈翔宇, 张懿刚, 李浩令, 邱天, 谈燚. USP24及其共表达肿瘤代谢基因在肝细胞癌中的诊断和预后预测作用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 659-662.
[2] 顾雯, 凌守鑫, 唐海利, 甘雪梅. 两种不同手术入路在甲状腺乳头状癌患者开放性根治性术中的应用比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 687-690.
[3] 付成旺, 杨大刚, 王榕, 李福堂. 营养与炎症指标在可切除胰腺癌中的研究进展[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 704-708.
[4] 梁孟杰, 朱欢欢, 王行舟, 江航, 艾世超, 孙锋, 宋鹏, 王萌, 刘颂, 夏雪峰, 杜峻峰, 傅双, 陆晓峰, 沈晓菲, 管文贤. 联合免疫治疗的胃癌转化治疗患者预后及术后并发症分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 619-623.
[5] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[6] 孙建娜, 孔令军, 任崇禧, 穆坤, 王晓蕊. 266例首诊Ⅳ期乳腺癌手术患者预后分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 502-505.
[7] 袁庆港, 刘理想, 张亮, 周世振, 高波, 丁超, 管文贤. 尿素-肌酐比值(UCR)可预测结直肠癌患者术后的长期预后[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 506-509.
[8] 黄福, 王黔, 金相任, 唐云川. VEGFR2、miR-27a-5p在胃癌组织中的表达与临床病理参数及预后的关系研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 558-561.
[9] 张瑜, 姜梦妮. 基于DWI信号值构建局部进展期胰腺癌放化疗生存获益预测模型[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 657-664.
[10] 伍细蓉, 徐立文, 陈亚琼. 基于LPR和FARI构建肝衰竭患者生存预后模型[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 675-681.
[11] 崔健, 夏青, 林云, 李光玲, 李心娜, 王位. 血小板与淋巴细胞比值、免疫球蛋白、心肌酶谱及心电图对中老年肝硬化患者病情及预后的影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 400-406.
[12] 李素娟, 王文玲, 董洪敏, 李小凯, 黄思成, 王刚. 多原发与单原发大肠腺癌的预后分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 407-412.
[13] 孙文恺, 沈青, 杭丽, 张迎春. 纤维蛋白原与清蛋白比值、中性粒细胞与白蛋白比值、C反应蛋白与溃疡性结肠炎病情评估和预后的关系[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 426-431.
[14] 郭曌蓉, 王歆光, 刘毅强, 何英剑, 王立泽, 杨飏, 汪星, 曹威, 谷重山, 范铁, 李金锋, 范照青. 不同亚型乳腺叶状肿瘤的临床病理特征及预后危险因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 524-532.
[15] 闫战涛, 王辉, 周梓迪, 史勇强, 陈铜兵. 胃淋巴上皮瘤样癌三级淋巴结构特征及其与预后的相关性[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 455-461.
阅读次数
全文


摘要