间隙平衡与测量截骨技术对全膝关节置换术疗效影响的Meta分析

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8757.2022.04.007

目的

评价全膝关节置换术（TKA）中间隙平衡（GB）技术和测量截骨（MR）技术的应用效果。

方法

检索PubMed、Embase、中国知网、维普、万方、中国生物医学文献数据库等数据库中2009年5月至2021年5月发表的有关TKA术中GB和MR应用效果对比的随机对照临床试验文献，同时手工检索杂志目录以及参考文献。所有文献严格按照Cochrane标准进行偏倚风险评估，并根据改良Jadad量表评价文献质量。采用Review Manager 5.3软件对术后膝关节协会功能评分（KSFS）、术后膝关节协会评分（KSS）、术后关节活动度、术后下肢力线与小腿解剖轴夹角、术后机械轴夹角、术后关节间隙、术中截骨量、手术时间进行Meta分析。

结果

共纳入16篇文献进行Meta分析，其中外文文献12篇，中文文献4篇。总体上采用MR技术的TKA术后KSFS、KSS优于GB技术（MD=2.12，95%CI：0.74~3.50，P<0.01），但采用GB的TKA术后下肢力线与小腿解剖轴夹角（MD=-1.00，95%CI：-1.86~-0.13，P<0.05）、机械轴夹角（MD=-0.39，95%CI：-0.65~-0.13，P<0.01）均优于MR。

结论

采用TKA治疗中重度膝关节骨性关节炎时，MR技术具有更好的功能学评分，而GB技术在影像学评价中更具优势。

关键词: 间隙平衡, 测量截骨, 全膝关节置换术, 效果, Meta分析

Objective

To evaluate the effect of gap balance (GB) and measured resection (MR) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Methods

Searches for randomized controlled clinical trials on the comparison of GB and MR effects during TKA published from May 2009 to May 2021 were performed in PubMed, Embase, CNKI, Vip, Wanfang, China Biomedical Literature Database, etc. And the magazine catalogue and references were searched manually. Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess the underling risk of bias of the included literature, and the quality of included literature was assessed with Jadad score. Meta analysis was performed in postoperative knee society function score (KSFS), postoperative knee society score (KSS), postoperative range of motion, postoperative angle between lower limb force line and leg anatomical axis, postoperative mechanical axis angle, postoperative joint space, intraoperative osteotomy and operation time using Review Manager 5.3.

Results

A total of 16 articles were included for meta analysis, including 12 in foreign languages and 4 in Chinese. MR was better in the overall KSFS and KSS than GB (MD=2.12, 95%CI: 0.74~3.50, P < 0.01), while GB was better in the angle between the lower limb force line and the leg anatomical axis (MD=-1.00, 95%CI: -1.86~0.13, P < 0.05), and the angle between the mechanical axis than MR (MD=-0.39, 95%CI: -0.65~-0.13, P < 0.01).

Conclusion

In the treatment of moderate and severe knee osteoarthritis with TKA, MR has a better functional score, while GB has more advantages in imaging results.

Key words: Gap balance, Measuring resection, Total knee arthroplasty, Effect, Meta analysis

图1 文献筛选流程图

表1 纳入文献的基本特征

作者	国家	发表年份	分组（GB组/MR组，例）	平均年龄（GB组/MR组，岁）	男性（GB组/MR组，例）	随访时间（月）	结局指标	改良Jadad质量评价
Babazadeh等^[10]	澳大利亚	2014	51/52	69.9/70.2	14/22	24	①⑤⑥	6
Baier等^[11]	德国	2014	19/21	70.0/72.4	15*	6	①②	5
Cidambi等^[12]	美国	2018	48/43	62.3*	41*	—	⑤	4
Hommel等^[13]	德国	2017	100/100	67.1/66.9	38/37	120	①②④⑦	7
Hernández-Hermoso等^[14]	西班牙	2019	39/33	70.2±6.7/69.9±7.4	8/4	24	①	4
Lee等^[15]	韩国	2010	60/56	68.7/69.2	3/2	24	④⑤	5
Lee等^[16]	韩国	2011	30/30	68.9/68.9	2/2	24	⑤⑦	4
袁兴期等^[17]	中国	2020	45/45	69.71±5.25/69.38±5.04	19/17	12	①②③⑥⑦	6
Moorthy等^[18]	新加坡	2020	50/50	68.4±7.0/66.1±7.2	10/12	24	①②	4
Pang等^[19]	新加坡	2011	70/70	68/70	10/12	24	①②④	5
Tapasvi等^[20]	印度	2020	50/50	66±7.4*	10*	24	②④⑥	5
Teeter等^[21]	加拿大	2017	12/12	67.2±7.0/70.0±7.9	7/3	12	①	4
Tigani等^[22]	意大利	2010	57/66	67/69	15/20	—	④	4
吴建明等^[23]	中国	2019	38/38	60.1±6.3/58.8±6.4	16/13	12	①③⑥⑦	6
柴瑞宝等^[24]	中国	2020	39/39	71.46±4.97/70.30±4.11	20/21	24	③⑦	4
王帝等^[25]	中国	2020	44/44	65.19±3.19/65.35±3.28	24/28	12		4

表1 纳入文献的基本特征

作者	国家	发表年份	分组（GB组/MR组，例）	平均年龄（GB组/MR组，岁）	男性（GB组/MR组，例）	随访时间（月）	结局指标	改良Jadad质量评价
Babazadeh等^[10]	澳大利亚	2014	51/52	69.9/70.2	14/22	24	①⑤⑥	6
Baier等^[11]	德国	2014	19/21	70.0/72.4	15*	6	①②	5
Cidambi等^[12]	美国	2018	48/43	62.3*	41*	—	⑤	4
Hommel等^[13]	德国	2017	100/100	67.1/66.9	38/37	120	①②④⑦	7
Hernández-Hermoso等^[14]	西班牙	2019	39/33	70.2±6.7/69.9±7.4	8/4	24	①	4
Lee等^[15]	韩国	2010	60/56	68.7/69.2	3/2	24	④⑤	5
Lee等^[16]	韩国	2011	30/30	68.9/68.9	2/2	24	⑤⑦	4
袁兴期等^[17]	中国	2020	45/45	69.71±5.25/69.38±5.04	19/17	12	①②③⑥⑦	6
Moorthy等^[18]	新加坡	2020	50/50	68.4±7.0/66.1±7.2	10/12	24	①②	4
Pang等^[19]	新加坡	2011	70/70	68/70	10/12	24	①②④	5
Tapasvi等^[20]	印度	2020	50/50	66±7.4*	10*	24	②④⑥	5
Teeter等^[21]	加拿大	2017	12/12	67.2±7.0/70.0±7.9	7/3	12	①	4
Tigani等^[22]	意大利	2010	57/66	67/69	15/20	—	④	4
吴建明等^[23]	中国	2019	38/38	60.1±6.3/58.8±6.4	16/13	12	①③⑥⑦	6
柴瑞宝等^[24]	中国	2020	39/39	71.46±4.97/70.30±4.11	20/21	24	③⑦	4
王帝等^[25]	中国	2020	44/44	65.19±3.19/65.35±3.28	24/28	12		4

图2 全膝关节置换术中GB与MR技术对术后KSFS、KSS影响的Meta分析注：GB指间隙平衡技术；MR指测量平衡技术；KSFS指膝关节协会功能评分；KSS指膝关节协会评分

图3 全膝关节置换术中GB与MR技术对术后关节活动度影响的Meta分析注：GB指间隙平衡技术；MR指测量平衡技术；ROM：关节活动度

图4 全膝关节置换术中GB与MR对术后下肢力线与小腿解剖轴夹角影响的Meta分析注：GB指间隙平衡技术；MR指测量平衡技术

图5 全膝关节置换术中GB与MR对术后机械轴夹角影响的Meta分析注：GB指间隙平衡技术；MR指测量平衡技术

图6 全膝关节置换术中GB与MR对术后关节间隙影响的Meta分析注：GB指间隙平衡技术；MR指测量平衡技术

图7 全膝关节置换术中GB与MR对术中截骨量影响的Meta分析注：GB指间隙平衡技术；MR指测量平衡技术

图8 全膝关节置换术中GB与MR对手术时间影响的Meta分析注：GB指间隙平衡技术；MR指测量平衡技术

图9 全膝关节置换术中GB与MR技术应用效果的文献发表偏倚漏斗图注：A：术后膝关节功能评分、膝关节协会评分；B：术后关节活动度；C：术后下肢力线与小腿解剖轴夹角；D：术后机械轴夹角；E：术后关节间隙；F：术中截骨量；G：手术时间。GB指间隙平衡技术；MR指测量平衡技术

[1]	Vogel N, Kaelin R, Rychen T, et al. The German version of the High-Activity Arthroplasty Score is valid and reliable for patients after total knee arthroplasty[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2022, 30(4):1204-1211.
[2]	Wang Z, Cheng X, Zhang Y, et al. Restoration of constitutional alignment in tka with a novel osteotomy technique[J]. J Knee Surg, 2020, 33(2):190-199.
[3]	Miyasaka T, Saito M, Kurosaka D, et al. Impact of posterior femoral condylar cartilage and posterior intercondylar distance on rotation of femoral component in total knee arthroplasty[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2020, 21(1):498-451.
[4]	Yulou S, Yanqin X, Yongjun X, et al. Method and effect of total knee arthroplasty osteotomy and soft tissue release for serious knee joint space narrowing[J].Open Med (Wars), 2015, 10(1):457-461.
[5]	Arnholdt J, Boelch SP, Dogan F, et al. Revision arthroplasty with rotating hinge systems for total knee arthroplasty instability[J]. Oper Orthop Traumatol, 2020, 32(4): 298-308.
[6]	Parker DA, Dunbar MJ, Rorabeck CH, et al. Extensor mechanism failure associated with total knee arthroplasty: Prevention and management[J]. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2003, 11(4):238-247.
[7]	De Wachter E, Vanlauwe J, Krause R, et al. Clinical and radiographic outcome of gap balancing versus measured resection techniques in total knee arthroplasty[J]. Arthroplast Today, 2020, 6(4):835-844.
[8]	Migliorini F, Eschweiler J, Mansy YE, et al. Gap balancing versus measured resection for primary total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis study[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2020, 140(9):1245-1253.
[9]	Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary[J]? Control Clin Trials, 1996, 17(1):1-12.
[10]	Babazadeh S, Dowsey MM, Stoney JD, et al. Gap balancing sacrifices joint-line maintenance to improve gap symmetry: A randomized controlled trial comparing gap balancing and measured resection[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2014, 29(5):950-954.
[11]	Baier C, Fitz W, Craiovan B, et al.Improved kinematics of total knee replacement following partially navigated modified gap-balancing technique[J]. Int Orthop, 2014, 38(2):243-249.
[12]	Cidambi KR, Robertson N, Borges C, et al. Intraoperative comparison of measured resection and gap balancing using a force sensor: A prospective, randomized controlled trial[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2018, 33(7):126-130.
[13]	Hommel H, Kunze D, Hommel P, et al. Small improvements in postoperative outcome with gap balancing technique compared with measured resection in total knee arthroplasty[J]. Open Orthop J, 2017, 11(1):1236-1244.
[14]	Hernández-Hermoso JA, Nescolarde-Selva L, Rodríguez-Montserrat D, et al. Different femoral rotation with navigated flexion-gap balanced or measured resection in total knee arthroplasty does not lead to different clinical outcomes[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2019, 28(6):1805-1813.
[15]	Lee DH, Park JH, Song DI, et al. Accuracy of soft tissue balancing in TKA: Comparison between navigation-assisted gap balancing and conventional measured resection[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2010, 18(3):381-387.
[16]	Lee HJ, Lee JS, Jung HJ, et al. Comparison of joint line position changes after primary bilateral total knee arthroplasty performed using the navigation-assisted measured gap resection or gap balancing techniques[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2011, 19(12):2027-2032.
[17]	袁兴期，冯瑛琦，许飞.TKA术中间隙平衡与测量截骨技术行股骨外旋截骨效果分析[J].中国现代手术学杂志，2020，24（5）：347-352.
[18]	Moorthy V, Lai MC, Liow MHL, et al. Similar postoperative outcomes after total knee arthroplasty with measured resection and gap balancing techniques using a contemporary knee system: A randomized controlled trial[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2020, 29(10):3178-3185.
[19]	Pang HN, Yeo SJ, Chong HC, et al. Computer-assisted gap balancing technique improves outcome in total knee arthroplasty, compared with conventional measured resection technique[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2011, 19(9):1496-1503.
[20]	Tapasvi SR, Shekhar A, Patil SS, et al. Comparison of gap balancing vs measured resection technique in patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty: One technique per knee[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2020, 35(3):732-740.
[21]	Teeter MG, Perry KI, Yuan X, et al. Contact kinematic differences between gap balanced vs measured resection techniques for single radius posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2017, 32(6):1834-1838.
[22]	Tigani D, Sabbioni G, Ben Ayad R, et al. Comparison between two computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty: Gap-balancing versus measured resection technique[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2010, 18(10):1304-1310.
[23]	吴建明，胡伟，刘向阳，等.全膝关节置换中采用测量截骨与间隙平衡技术的对比分析[J].中国组织工程研究，2019，23（18）：2817-2821.
[24]	柴瑞宝，刘瑞，张子安.间隙平衡与测量截骨技术在全膝关节置换的比较[J].中国矫形外科杂志，2020，28（9）：804-808.
[25]	王帝，韩立业，张爱民，等.不同截骨技术在老年全膝关节置换术中的效果对比研究[J].中国临床医生杂志，2020，48（11）：1343-1346.
[26]	Huijbregts HJ, Khan RJ, Fick DP, et al. Component alignment and clinical outcome following total knee arthroplasty: A randomised controlled trial comparing an intramedullary alignment system with patient-specific instrumentation[J]. Bone Joint J, 2016, 98(8):1043-1049 .
[27]	Laskin RS. Flexion space configuration in total knee arthroplasty[J]. J Arthroplasty, 1995, 10(5):657-660.
[28]	Scuderi GR, Komistek RD, Dennis DA, et al. The impact of femo-ral component rotational alignment on condylar lift-off[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2003, 4(10):148-154.
[29]	文鹏飞，郝林杰，王军，等.间隙平衡和测量截骨技术在分期双侧全膝关节置换术中的对比研究[J].中华医学杂志，2022，102（37）：2926-2932.
[30]	Kakuta A, Ikeda R, Takeshita B, et al. Intraoperative changes in medial joint gap after posterior femoral condylar resection, posterior osteophyte removal, and femoral component placement during primary total knee arthroplasty[J]. Knee, 2022, 39:1-9.
[31]	Zheng K, Zhu F, Zhang W, et al. Total knee arthroplasty using adjusted restricted kinematic alignment for the treatment of severe varus deformity: Technical note[J]. Orthop Surg, 2022, 14(8):1892-1901.
[32]	Okazaki K. Adopting the joint line theory for bone resection in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty to prevent flexion gap tightness[J]. Orthop Surg, 2022, 14(5):984-989.
[33]	Supreeth S, Yukata K, Suetomi Y, et al. Optimal intraoperative medial joint gap in extension to prevent flexion contracture following total knee arthroplasty using modified gap balancing technique[J]. J Clin Orthop Trauma, 2022, 33:101992.
[34]	Sameshima S, Inui H, Taketomi S, et al. The intraoperative gap differences due to joint distraction force differences in total knee arthroplasty are affected by preoperative lower limb alignment and body mass index[J]. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 2022, 99:105765.
[35]	Winnock de Grave P, Kellens J, Luyckx T, et al. Inverse kinematic alignment for total knee arthroplasty[J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2022, 108(5):103305.
[36]	Kamei G, Ishibashi S, Yoshioka K, et al. Accuracy of total knee arthroplasty using the modified gap technique based on the bone gap: An evaluation of the bone gap with a distal femoral trial component[J]. Arthroplasty, 2021, 3(1):17.

[1]	蚁淳, 袁冬生, 熊学军. 系统免疫炎症指数与骨密度降低和骨质疏松的关联[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 609-617.
[2]	李志文, 李远志, 李华, 方志远. 糖皮质激素治疗膝骨关节炎疗效的网状Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 484-496.
[3]	吴姗姗, 潘裕民, 刘晋, 张劲松, 乔莉. 睡眠呼吸暂停综合征患者静脉血栓栓塞症发生率的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 312-317.
[4]	王岩, 钱宏阳, 朱寅杰, 董柏君, 潘家骅, 薛蔚. 机器人辅助单孔腹膜外根治性前列腺切除治疗高危前列腺癌的瘤控效果初探[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 435-440.
[5]	何岩, 向文采. 七氟醚与异丙酚联合氯胺酮麻醉在疝修补术中的镇静镇痛效果及安全性[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 566-569.
[6]	窦恩, 郑磊, 徐通海, 邓先锐. 局部神经阻滞麻醉在成人腹股沟疝无张力修补术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 442-445.
[7]	马振威, 宋润夫, 王兵. ERCP胆道内支架与骑跨十二指肠乳头支架置入治疗不可切除肝门部胆管癌疗效的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 807-812.
[8]	龚财芳, 赵俊宇, 游川. 围手术期肠内营养在肝癌肝切除患者中有效性及安全性的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 551-556.
[9]	郁凯, 曾保起, 杨剑, 杨杰, 张殿英, 孙凤. 全关节镜与切开手术治疗肩袖撕裂疗效比较的系统综述与Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 238-245.
[10]	袁楠, 黄梦杰, 白云凤, 李晓帆, 罗从娟, 陈健文. 急性肾损伤-慢性肾脏病转化小鼠模型制备的教学要点及学习效果分析[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 226-230.
[11]	王芳, 刘达, 左智炜, 盛金平, 陈庭进, 蒋锐. 定量CT与双能X线骨密度仪对骨质疏松诊断效能比较的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 363-371.
[12]	周倩妹, 王宪娥, 徐筱, 老慧琳, 赵欣悦, 胡菁颖. 多元化系统护理对老年人群牙周健康指标影响的系统评价[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 500-506.
[13]	袁捷, 乔钰琪, 李彦冬. 二甲双胍、来曲唑联合地屈孕酮治疗多囊卵巢综合征合并不孕症的效果评价[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 343-347.
[14]	扈姝琴, 许红燕, 曹丹, 丁亚艳. 云平台视频管理在患儿重症哮喘中的应用及对应对方式的影响研究[J/OL]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 218-223.
[15]	李兆, 李兆鹏, 宋逸, 郭栋, 陈栋, 李宇. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除术后残胃容积的测量方案及评价[J/OL]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 242-247.

阅读次数

全文

摘要

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

Meta analysis of the effect of gap balance and measurement osteotomy in total knee arthroplasty

模态框（Modal）标题

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

Meta analysis of the effect of gap balance and measurement osteotomy in total knee arthroplasty