切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华老年病研究电子杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 06 ›› Issue (04) : 27 -30. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8757.2019.04.006

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

老年肺癌患者的营养状况和炎症水平及其相关性
郭娜娜1, 李宝山1,()   
  1. 1. 044000 山西省运城市中心医院
  • 收稿日期:2019-06-15 出版日期:2019-11-28
  • 通信作者: 李宝山

Nutritional status, inflammatory level and their correlation in elderly patients with lung cancer

Na'na Guo1, Baoshan Li1,()   

  1. 1. Yuncheng Central Hospital, Yuncheng 044000, China
  • Received:2019-06-15 Published:2019-11-28
  • Corresponding author: Baoshan Li
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Li Baoshan, Email:
引用本文:

郭娜娜, 李宝山. 老年肺癌患者的营养状况和炎症水平及其相关性[J]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2019, 06(04): 27-30.

Na'na Guo, Baoshan Li. Nutritional status, inflammatory level and their correlation in elderly patients with lung cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Geriatrics Research(Electronic Edition), 2019, 06(04): 27-30.

目的

探讨老年肺癌患者的营养状况和炎症水平及其相关性。

方法

选择2016年10月至2019年3月运城市中心医院收治的肺癌患者120例(观察组)及同期健康体检者120例(对照组)。采用主观整体营养评定量表(PG-SGA)进行营养评定,分为A(0~3分)、B(4~8分)、C(≥9分)三级,同时利用ELASA法测定血清炎性指标[包括白介素1(interleukin-1,IL-1)、肿瘤坏死因子α(tumor necrosis factor α, TNF-α)]。比较两组对象营养状况和炎症水平,分析其相关性。组间比较采用独立样本t检验,计数资料的比较采用χ2检验。

结果

观察组营养不良患者占85.7%,对照组营养不良患者占55.0%,差异有统计学意义(χ2=32.163,P<0.05)。观察组IL-1、TNF-α水平均显著高于对照组(t=6.052、4.479,均P<0.01)。不同营养分级肺癌患者IL-1水平的差异无统计学意义(F=0.143,P>0.05)、TNF-α水平的差异有统计学意义(F=50.005,P<0.01)。营养良好的肺癌患者IL-1、TNF-α水平均显著低于中度和重度营养不良者(t=-5.068、-9.686,均P<0.01),中度营养不良肺癌患者TNF-α水平显著低于重度营养不良者(t=-5.584,P<0.01)。

结论

老年肺癌患者普遍存在营养不良和慢性低度炎症情况,营养不良与慢性低度炎症可能呈相互促进作用。

Objective

To explore nutritional status, inflammatory level and their correlation in elderly patients with lung cancer.

Methods

120 patients with lung cancer (observation group) and 120 healthy people (control group) admitted to Yuncheng Central Hospital from October 2016 to March 2019 were selected. The subjective overall nutrition assessment scale (PG-SGA) was used for nutrition assessment, which was divided into class A (0 to 3 points), class B (4 to 8 points), and class C (≥9 points). At the same time, the serum inflammatory indicators [including interleukin-1 (IL-1), tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α)] were measured by ELASA method. The nutritional status and inflammation levels of the two groups were compared, and their correlation was analyzed. The comparison between groups was performed using independent sample t test, and the comparison of count data was performed using chi-square test.

Results

The malnutrition patients in the observation group accounted for 85.7%, and the malnutrition patients in the control group accounted for 55.0%, the difference was statistically significant (χ2=32.163, P < 0.05). The levels of IL-1 and TNF-α in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group (t=6.052, 4.479, P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in IL-1 levels between patients with different nutritional grades of lung cancer (F=0.143, P > 0.05), and the difference in TNF-α levels was statistically significant (F=50.005, P < 0.01). The levels of IL-1 and TNF-α in well-nourished patients with lung cancer were significantly lower than those with moderate and severe malnutrition (t=-5.068, -9.686, all P < 0.01), and the levels of TNF-α in patients with moderately malnourished lung cancer were significantly lower than those with severe malnutrition (t=-5.584, P < 0.01).

Conclusion

Malnutrition and chronic low-grade inflammation are common in elderly patients with lung cancer. Malnutrition and chronic low-grade inflammation may promote each other.

表1 两组对象营养分级分布情况的比较[例(%)]
表2 两组对象营养相关指标的比较
表3 两组对象炎性因子IL-1、TNF-α水平的比较
表4 不同营养分级肺癌患者炎性因子IL-1、TNF-α水平的比较
[1]
Agarwalla R, Saikia AM, Baruah R. Assessment of the nutritional status of the elderly and its correlates[J].J Family Community Med, 2015, 22(1):39-43.
[2]
Holst M, Staun M, Kondrup J, et al. Good nutritional practice in hospitals during an 8-year period: The impact of accreditation[J]. e-SPEN J, 2014, 9(4):e155-e160.
[3]
Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD. Cancer statistics in China, 2015 [J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2016, 66(2):115-132.
[4]
Hébuterne X, LemariéE, Michallet M, et al. Prevalence of malnutrition and current use of nutrition support in patients with cancer[J]. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, 2014, 38(2):196-204.
[5]
王光元.96例慢性阻塞性肺疾病合并支气管肺癌的临床分析[J].中国保健营养,2013,23(1):126-127.
[6]
Gong L, Cumpian AM, Caetano MS, et al. Promoting effect of neutrophils on lung tumorigenesis is mediated by CXCR2 and neutrophil elastase[J/OL]. Mol Cancer, 2013, 12(1):154
[7]
Taivassalo T, Hussain SNA. Contribution of the mitochondria to lo-comotor muscle dysfunction in patients with COPD[J]. Chest, 2016, 149(5):1302-1312.
[8]
Laucho-Contreras ME, Polverino F, Gupta K, et al. Protective role for club cell secretory protein-16 (CC16) in the development of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease[J]. Eur Respir J, 2015, 45(6):1544-1556.
[9]
Tomimura CN, Mayumi VIT, Paula KA, et al. Influence of insulin resistance and TNF-αon the inflammatory process, oxidative stress, and disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis[J].Oxid Med Cell Longev, 2016, 12(1):1-9.
[10]
李敬会,蔡莉莉,李丽娜. N-乙酰半胱氨酸对老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病炎性反应的影响[J].实用老年医学,2015,29(4):330-332.
[11]
王兴邦,戴春,于在诚.非小细胞肺癌患者血清中炎症相关细胞因子的表达及其变化影响因素[J].现代肿瘤医学,2018,26(10):1540-1544.
[12]
孔建华,张洁,滑莹莹,等.营养风险筛查在老年糖尿病肾病患者营养评估中的应用[J].中国临床保健杂志,2017,20(1):58-60.
[1] 李凤仪, 李若凡, 高旭, 张超凡. 目标导向液体干预对老年胃肠道肿瘤患者术后血流动力学、胃肠功能恢复的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 29-32.
[2] 晏晴艳, 雍晓梅, 罗洪, 杜敏. 成都地区老年转移性乳腺癌的预后及生存因素研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 636-638.
[3] 李婷婷, 吴荷玉, 张悦, 程康, 张晓芳, 程娅婵. 复合保温策略在老年腹腔镜解剖性肝切除术中的应用研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 522-525.
[4] 刘跃刚, 薛振峰. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝日间手术在老年患者中的安全性分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 711-714.
[5] 代格格, 杨丽, 胡媛媛, 周文婷. 手术室综合干预在老年腹股沟疝患者中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 759-763.
[6] 赵宏霞, 刘静, 李晓薇, 陈金婵, 汪志霞. 腹腔镜下经阴道子宫全切术联合阴道前后壁修补术治疗老年子宫脱垂效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 561-565.
[7] 孙伟, 林丽, 师高洋. 超声引导下连续髂腹股沟-髂腹下神经阻滞与腹横肌平面阻滞在老年腹股沟疝手术中应用效果比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 593-597.
[8] 张汪, 徐淑英, 张爱华, 夏芬荣, 汪露. 手术室体温护理结合细节护理干预在老年腹股沟疝围手术期的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 635-638.
[9] 梁开地, 缑文斌, 莫居容. 肺癌组织中细胞角蛋白18的表达及与预后的相关性[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(05): 688-690.
[10] 顾娇娇, 邹燕, 陈奕辰, 黄师菊, 张慧玲, 林楠. 基于简易营养评价精法评估肝癌患者出院后营养状况及其影响因素[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 534-539.
[11] 杨鹏, 刘冲. PFNA治疗老年股骨转子间骨折后隐匿性失血及其危险因素的横断面研究[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 301-306.
[12] 单秋洁, 孙立柱, 徐宜全, 王之霞, 徐妍, 马浩, 刘田田. 中老年食管癌患者调强放射治疗期间放射性肺损伤风险模型构建及应用[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 388-393.
[13] 姜里蛟, 张峰, 周玉萍. 多学科诊疗模式救治老年急性非静脉曲张性上消化道大出血患者的临床观察[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 520-524.
[14] 郭震天, 张宗明, 赵月, 刘立民, 张翀, 刘卓, 齐晖, 田坤. 机器学习算法预测老年急性胆囊炎术后住院时间探索[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 955-961.
[15] 晏美娟, 邵礼晖. 高水平脂蛋白(a)与无“三高”老年人群小动脉硬化型脑小血管病的相关性研究[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 458-463.
阅读次数
全文


摘要