切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华老年病研究电子杂志 ›› 2015, Vol. 02 ›› Issue (02) : 7 -11. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8757.2015.02.004

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

阿尔茨海默病及轻度认知功能障碍患者后扣带回皮质与全脑有向功能连接研究
于恩彦1,(), 谭云飞1, 廖峥娈1, 仇雅菊1, 朱俊鹏1, 丁忠祥2   
  1. 1. 310014 杭州,浙江省人民医院精神科
    2. 310014 杭州,浙江省人民医院放射科
  • 收稿日期:2014-10-13 出版日期:2015-05-28
  • 通信作者: 于恩彦
  • 基金资助:
    浙江省自然科学基金(Y2091289); 省部共建项目(WKJ-ZJ-1503)

Posterior cingulate cortex and global cerebral directed functional connectivity in patients with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease

Enyan Yu1,(), Yunfei Tan1, Zhengluan Liao1, Yaju Qiu1, Junpeng Zhu1, Zhongxiang Ding2   

  1. 1. Department of Psychiatry, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou 310014, China
    2. Department of Radiology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou 310014, China
  • Received:2014-10-13 Published:2015-05-28
  • Corresponding author: Enyan Yu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Yu Enyan, Email:
引用本文:

于恩彦, 谭云飞, 廖峥娈, 仇雅菊, 朱俊鹏, 丁忠祥. 阿尔茨海默病及轻度认知功能障碍患者后扣带回皮质与全脑有向功能连接研究[J]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2015, 02(02): 7-11.

Enyan Yu, Yunfei Tan, Zhengluan Liao, Yaju Qiu, Junpeng Zhu, Zhongxiang Ding. Posterior cingulate cortex and global cerebral directed functional connectivity in patients with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease[J]. Chinese Journal of Geriatrics Research(Electronic Edition), 2015, 02(02): 7-11.

目的

探讨阿尔茨海默病(alzheimer disease,AD)和轻度认知功能障碍(mild cognitive impairment,MCI)患者及正常老年人之间后扣带回皮质(posterior cingulate cortex,PCC)与全脑间有向功能连接的差异。

方法

选取2012年7月至2014年6月浙江省人民医院收治的AD患者32例(AD组)及MCI患者26例(MCI组),同期另择健康体检正常老年人58例作为正常对照组。在静息态脑功能成像的基础上,利用Granger causality分析(GCA)和独立成分分析进行有向功能连接的研究。采用单因素方差分析筛选出3组间有向功能强度有差异的连接,然后对其脑区进行感兴趣区分析;再利用DPARSF及REST软件进行静息态脑功能原始数据分析,采用t检验删选出两组间有差异的功能连接。

结果

(1)差异有统计学意义的有向连接都是单向的,即全脑到PCC有向连接的异常节点在接受PCC信息时并未出现异常,反之亦然;(2)与正常对照组比较,AD组的异常有向连接主要在默认脑网络(default mode network,DMN)脑区外;而与MCI组比较,AD组的异常有向连接则大多是在DMN脑区内,主要集中在左侧大脑半球,并呈现左右不对称的特点。

结论

PCC作为DMN脑区中一个重要的枢纽节点,在AD的进展中起着非常重要的作用。PCC的有向连接异常进一步证实AD的信息传递异常是有方向性的,且左右侧连接异常的不对称与优势大脑的使用相关。

Objective

To investigate the differences of directed functional connectivity between patients with mild cognitive impairment(MCI)/Alzheimer’s disease(AD) and healthy older.

Methods

Patients being treated at Zhejiang provincial people’s hospital from July 2012 to June 2014 were selected and divided into three groups, including Alzheimer disease group (n=32), the mild cognitive impairment group (n=26). Fitty-eight healthy olders over the same period were selected as normal control (NC) group (n=58). Based on resting state cerebral function imaging, the technique of independent component analysis (ICA) was applied to identify the brain hub nodes and Granger causality analysis (GCA) was used to explore the directed functional connectivity between PCC and the brain. One-way analysis of variance was used to screen out different directed functional connectivity among three groups, then regions of interest were analyzed in encephalic region, and original data analysis of resting state brain function was performed by DPARSF and REST,t-test was used to screen out the different directed functional connectivity between two groups.

Results

Almost all the abnormal directed functional connectivity were confirmed to be single-directed. Compared with NC group, the abnormal directed functional connectivity in AD group was in the other regions of the brain out of DMN. Compared with MCI, the most abnormal nodes in AD group were included in DMN, the abnormal direction between PCC and other regions of the brain was asymmetry. Most of the abnormal directions occur in the left hemisphere rather than the right.

Conclusion

As an important hub node in DMN, PCC plays an important role in the progress of AD. The abnormal directed functional connectivity in PCC further confirmed that abnormal signal transduction is directional, and the asymmetry of abnormal connectivity between the left and right is related to the usage of dominant hemisphere.

表1 3组研究对象一般资料的比较
图1 正常对照者扣带束MRI成像图[a:由静息态脑功能获得的DMN;b:勾画出的后扣带回(绿色)作为感兴趣区ROI]
图2 AD组与正常对照组脑功能有向连接比较的差异显示图
图3 MCI组与正常对照组脑功能有向连接比较的差异显示图
图4 AD组与MCI组脑功能有向连接比较的差异显示图
[1]
Delbeuck X, Van der Linden M, Collette F. Alzheimer’s disease as a disconnection syndrome[J]? Neuropsychol Rev, 2003, 13(2): 79-92.
[2]
Wang K, Liang M, Wang L, et al. Altered functional connectivity in early Alzheimer’s disease: a resting-state fMRI study[J]. Hum Brain Mapp, 2007, 28(10): 967-978.
[3]
Zhong Y, Huang L, Cai S, et al. Altered effective connectivity patterns of the default mode network in Alzheimer’s disease: an fMRI study[J]. Neurosci lett, 2014, 578: 171-175.
[4]
Raichle ME, MacLeod AM, Snyder AZ, et al. A default mode of brain function[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2001, 98(2):676-682.
[5]
Gusnard DA, Raichle ME. Searching for a baseline: functional imaging and the resting human brain.Nature reviews[J]. Nat Rev Neurosci, 2001, 2(10): 685-694.
[6]
Greicius MD, Krasnow B, Reiss AL, et al. Functional connectivity in the resting brain: a network analysis of the default mode hypothesis[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2003, 100(1): 253-258.
[7]
Ries ML, Schmitz TW, Kawahara TN, et al. Task-dependent posterior cingulate activation in mild cognitive impairment[J]. Neuroimage, 2006, 29(2): 485-492.
[8]
Braak H,Braak E. Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes[J]. Acta neuropathol, 1991, 82(4): 239-259.
[9]
Wang H, Golob E, Bert A, et al. Alterations in regional brain volume and individual MRI-guided perfusion in normal control, stable mild cognitive impairment, and MCI-AD converter[J]. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol, 2009, 22(1): 35-45.
[10]
Greicius MD, Srivastava G, Reiss AL, et al. Default-mode network activity distinguishes Alzheimer’s disease from healthy aging: evidence from functional MRI[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2004, 101(13): 4637-4642.
[11]
Wang L, Zang Y, He Y, et al. Changes in hippocampal connectivity in the early stages of Alzheimer’s disease: evidence from resting state fMRI[J]. Neuroimage, 2006, 31(2): 496-504.
[12]
Wierenga CE, Bondi MW. Use of functional magnetic resonance imaging in the early identification of Alzheimer’s disease[J]. Neuropsychol Rev, 2007, 17(2): 127-143.
[13]
Miao X, Wu X, Li R, et al. Altered connectivity pattern of hubs in default-mode network with Alzheimer’s disease: an Granger causality modeling approach[J]. PLoS One, 2011, 6(10):e25546.
[14]
Kaminski M, Ding M, Truccolo WA, et al. Evaluating causal relations in neural systems: granger causality, directed transfer function and statistical assessment of significance[J]. Biol Cybern, 2001, 85(2): 145-157.
[15]
Cabeza R. Hemispheric asymmetry reduction in older adults: the HAROLD model[J]. Psychol Aging, 2002, 17(1):85-100.
[16]
Critchley HD, Rolls ET. Olfactory neuronal responses in the primate orbitofrontal cortex: analysis in an olfactory discrimination task[J]. J Neurophysiol, 1996, 75(4): 1659-1672.
[17]
Prvulovic D, Hubl D, Sack AT, et al. Functional imaging of visuospatial processing in Alzheimer’s disease[J]. Neuroimage, 2002, 17(3): 1403-1414.
[18]
Zhang HY, Wang SJ, Xing J, et al. Detection of PCC functional connectivity characteristics in resting-state fMRI in mild Alzheimer’s disease[J]. Behav Brain Res, 2009, 197(1): 103-108.
[19]
Braak H, Braak E. Staging of Alzheimer-related cortical destruction[J]. Int Psychogeriatr, 1997, 9(Suppl 1): 257-261.
[20]
Reiman EM, Caselli RJ, Chen K, et al. Declining brain activity in cognitively normal apolipoprotein E epsilon 4 heterozygotes: a foundation for using positron emission tomography to efficiently test treatments to prevent Alzheimer’s disease[J].Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2001, 98(6): 3334-3339.
[1] 魏淑婕, 惠品晶, 丁亚芳, 张白, 颜燕红, 周鹏, 黄亚波. 单侧颈内动脉闭塞患者行颞浅动脉-大脑中动脉搭桥术的脑血流动力学评估[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1046-1055.
[2] 袁泽, 庄丽. 超声检测胎儿脐动脉和大脑中动脉血流对胎儿宫内窘迫的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 618-621.
[3] 王诗远, 张爱华. 慢性肾脏病相关认知障碍的发生机制研究进展[J]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 163-167.
[4] 李晓东, 魏云. 冠状切口额下入路治疗前颅窝巨大脑膜瘤[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 318-319.
[5] 黎鹏程, 黄谦亦, 张逵, 范润金, 尚彬. 手术切除颅内巨大假性动脉瘤一例报道并文献复习[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(02): 123-125.
[6] 郭翃江, 符雪彩, 朱妍妍, 严之红, 王丽娜, 纪红. 基于影响因素的老年阿尔茨海默病认知功能障碍预测模型构建及电子化认知康复训练的应用价值[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(03): 156-161.
[7] 胡飞龙, 路璐. 胞磷胆碱对大脑中动脉缺血性脑卒中恢复期的疗效[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(01): 51-56.
[8] 常文轩, 王婷, 刘伟, 蓝天琦, 彭静, 汪诗瑶, 张晓鹏, 冯晨, 宫雪梅, 朱敏. 脑小血管病所致执行障碍的研究进展[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(03): 179-182.
[9] 孙畅, 赵世刚, 白文婷. 脑卒中后认知障碍与内分泌激素变化的关系[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 471-476.
[10] 王道合, 施媛媛. 8-iso-PGF2α及P选择素在评估脑小血管病患者认知功能中的价值[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 364-368.
[11] 刘天姿, 王宝军. Toll样受体4在阿尔茨海默病中的研究进展[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 404-409.
[12] 李永凯, 吐尔洪·吐尔逊, 杨建中. 开颅术后患者大脑中动脉的经颅多普勒超声测量值与意识评分、血生化指标的相关性[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 221-226.
[13] 张宇, 蔡玉洁, 林日清, 邱钦杰, 崔理立, 郑东, 周海红. 张力蛋白1对放射性脑损伤小鼠认知功能的影响[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 244-253.
[14] 夏禹, 刘寒, 朱瑞. 阿尔茨海默病及相关认知障碍疾病与早老素2基因相关性的研究进展[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 290-293.
[15] 楚长彪. 卒中后认知障碍的管理[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 0-.
阅读次数
全文


摘要